Throughout influenza A virus an infection, the viral RNA polymerase transcribes the viral negative-sense segmented RNA genome and replicates it in a two-step course of through complementary RNA inside viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complexes. Whereas quite a few viral and host elements concerned in vRNP capabilities have been recognized, dissecting the roles of particular person elements stays difficult as a result of advanced mobile atmosphere during which vRNP exercise has been studied. To beat this problem, we reconstituted viral transcription and a full cycle of replication in a check tube utilizing vRNPs remoted from virions and recombinant elements important for these processes. This novel system uncovers the minimal parts required for influenza virus replication and likewise reveals new roles of regulatory elements in viral replication. Furthermore, it sheds gentle on the molecular interaction underlying the temporal regulation of viral transcription and replication. Our extremely sturdy in vitro system allows systematic purposeful evaluation of things modulating influenza virus vRNP exercise and paves the best way for imaging key steps of viral transcription and replication.
Quotation: Zhu Z, Fan H, Fodor E (2023) Defining the minimal parts of the influenza A virus replication equipment through an in vitro reconstitution system. PLoS Biol 21(11):
Tutorial Editor: Andrew Mehle, College of Wisconsin-Madison, UNITED STATES
Obtained: June 27, 2023; Accepted: October 9, 2023; Revealed: November 9, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Zhu et al. That is an open entry article distributed underneath the phrases of the Artistic Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and replica in any medium, offered the unique writer and supply are credited.
Knowledge Availability: All related information are inside the paper and its Supporting Info recordsdata.
Funding: This work was supported by Medical Analysis Council (MRC) programme grant MR/R009945/1 (to E.F.) and Clarendon Fund and Wellcome An infection, Immunity and Translational Drugs studentship (to Z.Z.). The funders had no position in research design, information assortment and evaluation, determination to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing pursuits: The authors have declared that no competing pursuits exist.
acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32; cRNA,
complementary RNA; EMSA,
electrophoretic mobility shift assay; FBS,
foetal bovine serum; LCAR,
low complexity acidic area; LRR,
leucine-rich repeat; MDBK,
Madin-Darby bovine kidney; MOI,
multiplicity of an infection; NA,
polymerase primary 1; PB2,
polymerase primary 2; PMSF,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; rNTP,
ribonucleotide triphosphate; SDS-PAGE,
sodium dodecyl sulfate 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; vRNA,
viral RNA; vRNP,
viral ribonucleoprotein; WT,
Influenza viruses include a segmented negative-sense RNA genome with every viral RNA (vRNA) section assembled into a person viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) advanced . Within the vRNP, the vRNA section varieties a pseudocircle with the termini sure by a single copy of the vRNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the remainder of the RNA encapsidated by an oligomer of viral nucleoprotein (NP). Throughout viral an infection, vRNPs are delivered into the host cell nucleus the place they first act as templates for transcription producing capped and polyadenylated viral mRNA. As soon as viral proteins are translated and viral polymerase and NP accumulate within the nucleus, vRNPs swap to behave as templates for genome replication. Each transcription and replication of vRNA are carried out by the viral polymerase and require completely different modes of initiation and termination [2,3]. Transcription is a primer-dependent course of, requiring cap-snatching exercise of the polymerase, which depends on the affiliation of vRNPs with host RNA polymerase II . This affiliation allows the viral polymerase to entry nascent host capped RNAs which might be cleaved by the viral polymerase to generate a capped RNA fragment that acts as primer for transcription. Transcription terminates prematurely by the polymerase stuttering on a sequence of U residues near the tip of the vRNA template. In distinction, replication is a two-step primer-independent course of, requiring de novo initiation by the polymerase, and proceeds to the tip of the template, producing a whole copy of the template. In step one, complementary RNA (cRNA) is produced, which acts as template for vRNA synthesis within the second step. vRNA and cRNA are assembled with polymerase and NP into vRNPs and cRNPs, respectively, in a course of that’s believed to happen in a co-replicational method . Members of the acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 (ANP32) household of host proteins are important elements for influenza virus genome replication [6,7]. They’ve been proposed to assist influenza virus genome replication in 2 methods. First, the N-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) area of ANP32 bridges a dimer shaped by the resident polymerase from the vRNP and a newly translated viral polymerase, offering a platform for viral genome replication . Second, the C-terminal low complexity acidic area (LCAR) of ANP32 is concerned in NP recruitment throughout cRNP and vRNP meeting . The requirement of newly synthesized viral proteins along with host elements in replication signifies that whereas transcription happens early in an an infection, genome replication is just detectable later, after adequate ranges of viral proteins accumulate.
A lot of our present molecular understanding on vRNP capabilities has been gained by means of experiments carried out within the context of cells or mobile extracts. Dozens of host elements that regulate vRNP capabilities have been recognized utilizing assays akin to pull-downs of viral polymerase from transfected or contaminated cells adopted by the identification of interacting host proteins by mass spectrometry [6,10]. Nonetheless, the exact position of every viral and host issue stays unclear as a result of complexity of the mobile atmosphere during which they had been studied. Right here, we efficiently set up a sturdy in vitro system that reconstitutes influenza virus transcription and, importantly, a full cycle of genome replication, in a check tube. By this method, we show the minimal protein necessities for an entire viral genome replication cycle. Moreover, we reveal new roles for ANP32 proteins and NP which might be concerned in replication. Our system presents a strong instrument for elucidating the roles of regulatory elements in vRNP capabilities and paves the best way for imaging viral replication utilizing cryogenic strategies. Moreover, our methodology might be carried out to research the molecular mechanisms of genome replication in different negative-sense RNA viruses.
Viral polymerase and human ANP32B symbolize the minimal parts to change the exercise of vRNP from transcription to replication
To deal with the position of viral and host elements within the regulation of influenza virus transcription and replication, we purified virion-derived vRNP (vRNP) of influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus produced by infecting Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells and utilizing glycerol gradient centrifugation, as beforehand described (S1A Fig) . The molarity of purified vRNP was estimated by evaluating it to a serial dilution of recombinant viral polymerase of identified concentrations (S1B Fig). To review the minimal necessities of extra elements in influenza virus genome replication, we purified recombinant viral polymerase expressed in insect cells, in addition to ANP32 proteins expressed in E. coli (S2 Fig). Technical difficulties had been encountered throughout the expression and purification of recombinant A/WSN/33 polymerase; subsequently, we utilized a recombinant A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) polymerase, which shares over 96% sequence identification and almost 99% sequence similarity with its homologue from A/WSN/33 (H1N1), for subsequent experiments. We additionally purified a mutant polymerase with a double amino acid mutation in its polymerase lively website (D445A/D446A, PB1a) rendering it incapable of synthesising RNA (S2A Fig).
To judge the position of those viral and host elements, we arrange an in vitro vRNP replication reconstitution assay, adopted by the evaluation of RNAs by primer extension. To prime the transcriptional exercise of the vRNP-resident polymerase, globin mRNA was included within the assay as donor of capped RNA primers. Within the absence of ribonucleotide triphosphate (rNTP) substrates, solely vRNA might be detected, representing the vRNA derived from the purified vRNPs (Fig 1A, lane 1). Within the presence of rNTPs, a significant mRNA and a minor cRNA product was noticed (lane 2), as reported beforehand . The addition of ANP32B alone didn’t have an effect on RNA synthesis (lane 3), whereas the addition of viral polymerase alone, unbiased of its RNA synthesis exercise, resulted within the inhibition of mRNA synthesis (lanes 4 and 6). Nonetheless, the addition of ANP32B and polymerase collectively resulted in a sturdy improve in cRNA synthesis (lanes 5 and seven). This sturdy improve was noticed unbiased of whether or not lively (wild sort (WT)) or inactive (PB1a) polymerase was added (examine lanes 4 and 5 to lanes 6 and seven), demonstrating that replication was carried out by the vRNP-resident polymerase and the position of the extra polymerase is noncatalytic. Subsequently, the extra polymerase possible promotes the replicational exercise of the vRNP-resident polymerase in an allosteric method. Related outcomes had been obtained in a set of assays the place capped RNA was omitted, other than no mRNA being detected (Fig 1B).
Fig 1. Viral polymerase (FluPol) and human ANP32B (huANP32B) collectively promote vRNP replication.
(A, B) Impact of lively (WT) or inactive (PB1a) FluPol and huANP32B alone or collectively on vRNP exercise, within the presence (A) or absence (B) of globin mRNA as cap donor. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the RNA ranges obtained within the absence of FluPol and huANP32B. Atypical one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate significance. (C-E) Impact of accelerating quantities of FluPol and huANP32B (C), huANP32B alone (D), or FluPol alone (E). A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the mRNA ranges with out added FluPol and/or huANP32B. In (A-E), information symbolize imply values ± SEM, primarily based on n ≥ 3 unbiased vRNP purifications and reactions. ****, p < 0.0001. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. Unique information units are in S1 Knowledge. (F) Schematic displaying the impact of FluPol and huANP32B on the transcriptional and replicational exercise of vRNP.
To check the impact of those elements in a dose-dependent method, we titrated growing quantities of viral polymerase and ANP32B into the vRNP replication reconstitution assay within the presence of globin mRNA as a cap donor. We noticed a gradual decline in mRNA earlier than its full disappearance and a concomitant improve within the accumulation of cRNA (Fig 1C). In distinction, titration of ANP32B alone had no impact (Fig 1D), whereas titration of viral polymerase alone resulted in a decline in mRNA ranges (Fig 1E). These outcomes counsel that free polymerase alone can inhibit the transcriptional exercise of vRNP-associated polymerase; nonetheless, for its skill to advertise the replicase exercise, ANP32 is crucial. Taken collectively, our information show that non-template-bound viral polymerase and host ANP32 proteins act collectively to change the exercise of vRNPs from transcription to replication (Fig 1F).
ANP32 isoforms assist replication to completely different ranges, and LCAR is required for replication
Species-specific variations in ANP32 household proteins underpin the poor replication of avian influenza A viruses in mammalian hosts [12,13]. Particularly, mammalian ANP32 proteins can not assist the perform of avian influenza A virus polymerase. To additional examine the position of ANP32 household proteins, we in contrast the power of all 3 identified human isoforms of ANP32 proteins, ANP32A, ANP32B, and ANP32E , to assist viral genome replication within the presence of viral polymerase (Figs 2A and S2B). We additionally included rooster ANP32A, as a consultant of an avian ANP32, which comprises an insertion of 33 amino acids in its LCAR in comparison with human ANP32A [12,13] (Figs 2A and S2B). Apparently, amongst all ANP32 proteins examined, rooster ANP32A confirmed the strongest assist of replication. That is in settlement with earlier experiences that rooster ANP32A displays significantly sturdy binding for the viral polymerase [15,16]. Among the many human ANP32 proteins, ANP32B confirmed the strongest assist of replication, adopted by human ANP32A, whereas human ANP32E couldn’t, or solely very weakly, promote replication. The flexibility of every ANP32 protein to inhibit mRNA ranges within the presence of viral polymerase correlated with their skill to advertise replication, with rooster ANP32A being probably the most potent and human ANP32E displaying virtually related transcriptional inhibition as polymerase alone (Fig 2A). The discovering that human ANP32E is poor at supporting replicational exercise of vRNP is in settlement with earlier findings utilizing genetically engineered cell strains [17,18].
Fig 2. Impact of ANP32 isoforms and truncated mutants on vRNP replication.
(A) Impact of accelerating quantities of viral polymerase (FluPol) and rooster ANP32A (chA), human ANP32A (huA), human ANP32B (huB), or human ANP32E (huE) on vRNP exercise within the presence of globin mRNA as cap donor. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the mRNA ranges with out added FluPol and ANP32. (B) Impact of FluPol and full-length or truncated mutant chA on vRNP exercise within the presence of globin mRNA as cap donor. Schematic of chA and truncated mutants missing components or the entire LCAR. LRR and LCAR are proven in darkish and light-weight purple, respectively. The numbers underneath the schematic point out the size of every mutant in amino acids (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the RNA ranges obtained within the absence of FluPol and rooster ANP32A. Atypical one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate significance. In (A and B), information are symbolize imply values ± SEM, primarily based on n ≥ 3 unbiased vRNP purifications and reactions. ****, p < 0.0001. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. Unique information units are in S1 Knowledge. ANP32, acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32; LCAR, low complexity acidic area; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; vRNP, viral ribonucleoprotein.
We then requested whether or not the C-terminal LCAR is required for the exercise of ANP32 in supporting polymerase perform. To reply this, we generated a collection of rooster ANP32A mutants with truncated LCAR and examined them within the vRNP replication reconstitution assay (S2B Fig). Deletions of as much as 46 amino acid residues from the C-terminus of rooster ANP32A (1–250 and 1–235) didn’t dramatically change vRNP exercise in comparison with full-length rooster ANP32A (1–281). Nonetheless, when additional amino acid residues had been deleted (1–220, 1–188, 1–158, 1–149), the replication selling skill of ANP32A was diminished (Fig 2B), and no additional inhibition of transcriptional exercise was noticed past that with polymerase alone (Fig 2B).
Taken collectively, these outcomes show that completely different members of the ANP32 household proteins have distinct results on vRNP exercise, and the LCAR performs a beforehand uncharacterised position in selling genome replication, along with NP recruitment .
NP stimulates replicational exercise and allows a whole cycle of viral genome replication
We discovered that whereas the addition of viral polymerase and ANP32B to vRNPs resulted in sturdy cRNA synthesis, vRNA ranges remained unchanged (Figs 1A–1C, 2A and 2B), indicating that the generated cRNA couldn’t act as template for vRNA synthesis. Earlier research confirmed that viral NP is an important issue for replication of the viral genome, as solely quick templates (<100 nucleotides) might be replicated in its absence . Moreover, early research implicated that NP acts as a switching issue between transcription and replication [20,21]. To deal with the position of NP in replication, we purified NP of influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus expressed in E. coli (S3A Fig). Addition of recombinant NP alone to the vRNP replication reconstitution assay, with globin mRNA included as cap donor, had no impact on cRNA ranges, indicating that NP alone doesn’t promote the replicational exercise of vRNPs (Fig 3A, examine lane 3 to lane 2). Apparently, we noticed a lower within the mRNA degree, suggesting that, equally to free viral polymerase, NP may act as an allosteric modulator of the vRNP-resident polymerase, inhibiting its transcriptional exercise. NP had no extra impact when added together with ANP32B or viral polymerase (examine lanes 4 and 5 to lane 2). Nonetheless, when it was added along with ANP32B and viral polymerase, we noticed a considerable improve in cRNA synthesis in comparison with when solely ANP32B and polymerase had been added (examine lane 7 to lane 6), unbiased of whether or not lively (WT) or inactive (PB1a) polymerase was used (examine lanes 7 and 10). Excitingly, when lively polymerase was used we additionally noticed a definite improve within the vRNA degree, whereas no such improve was noticed with inactive polymerase (examine lane 10 to lane 7). These information present that NP is a further vital think about selling cRNA synthesis by a vRNP, and product cRNA can act as template for the synthesis of vRNA when lively viral polymerase, ANP32B, and NP are current. The latter means that together with NP along with viral polymerase and ANP32 protein allows product cRNA to be assembled into cRNPs that may perform vRNA synthesis. Nonetheless, it must be famous that there was solely a comparatively modest improve in vRNA alerts in comparison with the rise in cRNA alerts in response to the addition of polymerase, ANP32B, and NP. This statement is in keeping with not all cRNA being assembled into purposeful cRNPs, though the explanations behind this stay unclear. Related outcomes had been noticed when globin mRNA was omitted from the vRNP assay (Fig 3B). Titration of accelerating quantities of NP into the vRNP replication reconstitution assay within the presence of fixed quantity of inactive viral polymerase and ANP32B additional elevated cRNA ranges (Fig 3C), whereas the identical setup however utilizing lively viral polymerase resulted in a sturdy, concentration-dependent improve in each cRNA and vRNA ranges (Fig 3D), offering additional proof for the roles of NP in genome replication.
Fig 3. Viral NP promotes vRNP replication and allows a whole cycle of viral genome replication.
(A, B) Impact of NP alone or together with inactive (PB1a) or lively (WT) viral polymerase (FluPol) and human ANP32B (huANP32B) on vRNP exercise, within the presence (A) or absence (B) of globin mRNA as cap donor. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the RNA ranges obtained within the absence of FluPol, huANP32B, and NP. Atypical one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate significance. (C, D) Impact of accelerating quantities of NP within the presence of a continuing quantity of huANP32B and inactive FluPol (PB1a) (C) or lively FluPol (WT) (D) on vRNP exercise. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the RNA ranges with out added NP. (E) Impact of oligomerisation capability and RNA-binding skill on the capabilities of NP in viral replication. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven (prime). Relative RNA ranges (backside) had been calculated by evaluating them to the RNA ranges obtained within the absence of NP. Atypical one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate significance. In (A-E), information symbolize imply values ± SEM, primarily based on n ≥ 3 unbiased vRNP purifications and reactions. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. Unique information units are in S1 Knowledge. (F) Schematic displaying that FluPol, huANP32B, and NP are the minimal set of proteins required for an entire cycle of viral genome replication. NP, nucleoprotein; vRNP, viral ribonucleoprotein; WT, wild sort.
NP possesses each oligomerisation and RNA-binding actions . In vRNPs and cRNPs, these 2 properties allow NP to kind a polar oligomer by inserting its tail-loop right into a groove on the neighbouring molecule and supply a scaffold for the binding of RNA. To analyse the roles of NP in genome replication additional, we launched a number of mutations into NP and purified the mutant NPs expressed in E. coli (S3A Fig). Particularly, we changed 8 arginine residues with alanine residues within the proposed RNA-binding grooves to generate an RNA-binding mutant (8A), we launched an R416A mutation into the tail-loop to generate a monomeric mutant (M, faulty in oligomerisation) and mixed these mutations to provide a monomeric NP that can also be poor in RNA-binding (M8A) [23–26]. We confirmed beforehand by measurement exclusion chromatography that the R416A NP mutant from the A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus behaves as a monomer , and right here we confirmed that each M and M8A elute as monomers throughout purification on a Superdex 200 improve 10/300 GL column, whereas wild sort (WT) and the 8A mutant NP elute as oligomers (S3B Fig). By electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we confirmed that the 8A and M8A mutants are poor in RNA binding (S3C Fig). We then examined the impact of those mutants within the vRNP replication reconstitution assay (Fig 3E). We discovered that the monomeric mutant NP (M) may promote each cRNA and vRNA synthesis to comparable ranges as WT NP (examine lane 4 to lane 3). Nonetheless, the RNA-binding mutant NP (8A) was not in a position to assist a full cycle of viral genome replication, particularly synthesizing vRNA on cRNA templates, however curiously partially retained its skill to advertise cRNA synthesis from the enter vRNA template (examine lane 5 to lane 3). The monomeric mutant NP, which can also be poor in RNA binding (M8A), exhibited an identical phenotype, selling cRNA synthesis however not supporting vRNA synthesis (examine lane 6 to lane 3).
Our information present that NP has a perform in straight stimulating the replicational exercise of the polymerase, unbiased of its RNA-binding skill. Subsequently, NP not solely acts as a scaffold for RNA and facilitates its copying by the viral polymerase but in addition regulates replicational exercise. The discovering that an oligomerisation-defective mutant NP that retains RNA-binding can nonetheless assist genome replication, at the very least in vitro, means that oligomerization will not be an absolute requirement for NP’s position in supporting genome replication. Alternatively, the RNA binding skill of NP is essential for the meeting of replication competent cRNPs. These outcomes align with earlier analysis indicating that RNA binding, not homo-oligomerization, is crucial for NP’s skill to assist cRNA accumulation in contaminated cells . Nonetheless, it must be famous that monomeric NP helps cRNA accumulation at decreased ranges in comparison with WT and NP oligomerisation is required for the replication of full-length genome segments in assays carried out in cells [19,28]. We speculate that cRNPs and vRNPs assembled with monomeric NP may need elevated susceptibility to degradation by mobile nucleases.
In abstract, our outcomes present that NP performs 2 roles in genome replication: selling cRNA synthesis on vRNA templates within the presence of viral polymerase and ANP32 proteins, and enabling a full cycle of replication, that’s, vRNA to cRNA and cRNA to vRNA synthesis (Fig 3F). Importantly, by demonstrating that viral polymerase, ANP32 proteins, and NP are the minimal elements required for vRNP to perform a full cycle of replication, we set up the primary full in vitro replication reconstitution system for influenza virus.
On this research, we reconstituted a significant step of the influenza virus life cycle, viral genome replication, in a check tube. Utilizing vRNPs remoted from purified virions and recombinant viral polymerase, NP, and host ANP32 proteins, we established a wholly cell-free vRNP replication reconstitution assay for the influenza virus RNA genome that faithfully recapitulates each steps of replication, vRNA to cRNA and cRNA to vRNA synthesis, and the meeting of purposeful cRNPs. We outline that viral polymerase and ANP32 proteins are the minimal parts required for the replicational exercise of a vRNP, whereas NP additional promotes replicational exercise and is crucial for the meeting of purposeful cRNPs that may perform vRNA synthesis. Presumably, vRNA additionally assembles into purposeful vRNPs that may subsequently perform additional cRNA synthesis. Nonetheless, this stays to be decided, as our present assay can not distinguish cRNA produced by in vitro assembled vRNPs from that synthesised by enter vRNPs.
Viral polymerase switches between completely different enzymatic actions to assist transcription and replication at completely different phases of viral an infection. We discovered that vRNPs remoted from virions preferentially synthesize mRNA by means of the vRNP-resident polymerase, which acts as a transcriptase. Nonetheless, the addition of viral polymerase and ANP32 proteins converts the transcriptase right into a replicase, almost certainly by means of viral polymerase and ANP32 protein binding to the vRNP-resident polymerase and inducing a conformational rearrangement. These findings are in keeping with a lately proposed mannequin for influenza virus genome replication, primarily based on a cryo-EM construction of an influenza C virus polymerase dimer sure to an ANP32A protein . In keeping with this mannequin, newly translated viral polymerase is focused to the resident polymerase of a transcribing vRNP to kind a dimer, which is mediated by the N-terminal LRR area of an ANP32A protein. The vRNP-resident polymerase acts as replicase, whereas the extra polymerase acts as an encapsidating polymerase that captures the 5′ finish of the nascent cRNA and allows the co-replicational meeting of product cRNA right into a cRNP. The extremely acidic C-terminal LCAR of ANP32A has been proposed to behave as a platform for growing native NP focus across the replicating vRNP and selling NP recruitment to nascent cRNA throughout the meeting of cRNPs . These newly assembled cRNPs then give rise to vRNA synthesis, with extra viral polymerase and ANP32 proteins activating the replicational exercise of the cRNP-resident polymerase. Our work offers proof for this mannequin by displaying that non-vRNP-associated polymerase, ANP32, and NP are the minimal parts required for a full cycle of replication of a vRNA genome section within the context of a vRNP and affords additional insights into the workings of this molecular machine (Fig 4).
Fig 4. Mannequin summarising the modulation of vRNP exercise by viral and host elements within the in vitro vRNP replication reconstitution assay.
Virion-derived vRNPs preferentially synthesize mRNA within the presence of a capped RNA primer donor with the vRNP-resident polymerase appearing as transcriptase (1). Extra viral polymerase and ANP32 bind to the vRNP-resident polymerase and swap the vRNP-resident polymerase, by allosteric modification, from a transcriptase to a replicase that initiates cRNA synthesis in a primer-independent method (2). The ANP32-LRR stabilises the polymerase dimer, whereas the ANP32-LCAR performs a task in selling genome replication by means of a but to be found mechanism. NP additional promotes replication in an RNA-binding unbiased method (3). The 5′ finish of cRNA product is captured by the encapsidating polymerase, and the ANP32-LCAR promotes the co-replicational meeting of cRNA into cRNP by binding to NP and growing its native density (4). The RNA-binding skill of NP is required for the meeting of purposeful cRNP that may perform the second step of replication (5). Extra polymerase and ANP32 bind to the resident polymerase of newly assembled cRNP, changing the uncommitted polymerase to a replicase to carry out primer-independent initiation of vRNA synthesis (6). The synthesis of vRNA and its meeting into vRNP proceed in a way just like that described for cRNA above. ANP32, acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32; cRNA, complementary RNA; LCAR, low complexity acidic area; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; NP, nucleoprotein; vRNP, viral ribonucleoprotein.
Non-template-bound, free viral polymerase has been proven to be necessary for the buildup of cRNA replication merchandise in virus-infected cells and reasonably promoted the exercise of remoted cRNPs in vitro [29,30]. Apparently, a transcriptionally inactive type of viral polymerase was additionally in a position to stimulate exercise, suggesting that it’s the RNP-resident polymerase that acts as replicase whereas the second viral polymerase acts as a trans-activating polymerase [29,30], difficult an earlier mannequin during which polymerase was proposed to behave in trans, being accountable for the synthesis of the replication product . On this research, we firmly established that it’s the vRNP-resident polymerase that acts as replicase whereas the extra viral polymerase performs a noncatalytic allosteric position. We additionally verify that ANP32 household proteins, being an important a part of the replication equipment, play an indispensable position in supporting influenza viral genome replication. Apparently, we discovered that avian and human ANP32 isoforms differ of their potential to advertise genome replication, with avian (rooster) ANP32A having the strongest impact along with viral polymerase, main to a whole suppression of transcriptional exercise and a powerful promotion of cRNA synthesis. This might be associated to the elevated affinity of avian ANP32A for viral polymerase as reported beforehand [15,16]. Apparently, we additionally discovered that many of the LCAR is required for supporting cRNA synthesis, unbiased of the presence of NP, strongly suggesting that the LCAR is concerned in one other perform along with NP recruitment, almost certainly straight interacting with the viral polymerase.
The position of NP in regulating vRNP perform has been a topic of debate for a few years. Early research urged that NP is the essential issue that switches the polymerase from transcription to replication [20,21]. Nonetheless, subsequent research demonstrated that NP stabilises replication merchandise in cells, together with viral polymerase, by advantage of its RNA-binding skill, and performs no position in regulating polymerase perform . Right here, we current proof that NP is required for an entire cycle of viral genome replication. We additionally recognized a brand new position of NP in direct replication promotion that’s unbiased of its RNA-binding skill. By isolating the two steps of influenza virus replication, we suggest that NP can act as a further replication cue, presumably by interacting with the replication platform to additional promote replication. This might be advantageous as NP is ample, and binding of NP to the replicating platform may create a pool of NP accessible for recruitment by ANP32 household proteins in RNP meeting. Total, our outcomes present perception into the versatile roles of NP in influenza virus replication and supply new instructions for additional investigation.
The dependency of the vRNP-resident polymerase on the presence of free viral polymerase for its replicational exercise, together with the stimulatory position of NP, offers influenza virus with a sublime mechanism to time its genome replication such that it solely happens when adequate ranges of polymerase and NP gathered within the contaminated cell. This timing ensures that no bare cRNA and vRNA are produced, which, possessing 5′ triphosphates and a double-stranded panhandle area because of the partial complementarity of the termini, might be detected by pathogen recognition receptors akin to RIG-I to set off the activation of innate immune pathways and suppress influenza virus replication . Nonetheless, influenza virus an infection is understood to induce innate immune activation and faulty viral RNAs have been implicated as main innate immune inducers . Our system might be appropriate for assessing the constancy of the RNA polymerase and its potential to generate faulty viral RNAs and as such may present a platform for evaluating the position of the influenza virus RNA polymerase in innate immune activation and, consequently, as a determinant of virulence.
We present on this research that influenza virus genome replication depends on free non-vRNP related viral polymerase and an ANP32 protein; however, we additionally present that vRNPs can carry out low degree of cRNA synthesis within the absence of any extra issue. The query arises whether or not this low-level exercise is just an in vitro artefact or might be biologically related. If cRNA had been produced early in an infection when no or solely very low ranges of free viral polymerase and NP are current, such cRNA could be rapidly degraded by host nucleases. Nonetheless, we can not exclude the chance that some cRNA may escape degradation and being detected by RNA sensors may set off an innate immune response. It will be attention-grabbing to discover whether or not completely different influenza A virus strains, that’s, human seasonal, human pandemic, and avian, would possibly have the ability to produce completely different ranges of cRNA early on and subsequently induce completely different ranges of innate immune response that would impression virulence.
In abstract, we’ve got, for the primary time, reconstituted a full cycle of influenza virus genome replication in a check tube. This sturdy assay offers a extremely managed and simplified system to grasp the molecular particulars of influenza virus replication. Utilizing this novel in vitro system, we outlined the minimal requirement of viral and host elements which might be important for viral genome replication and confirmed intriguing new roles of viral and host elements on this course of. This breakthrough opens up avenues for additional exploration of influenza virus genome replication, together with using cryo-electron microscopy strategies to watch vRNPs at completely different phases throughout replication. Moreover, this system might be expanded to research different negative-sense RNA viruses.
Supplies and strategies
MDBK cells had been sourced from the Cell Financial institution of the Sir William Dunn College of Pathology. MDBK cells had been cultured in minimal important medium (MEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and a couple of mM L-glutamine (Gibco) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells had been form present from Dr. Weixian Lu (Division of Structural Biology, College of Oxford) and maintained in Sf-900 II serum-free medium at 27°C shaking at 110 revolutions per minute (rpm). Cell strains haven’t been authenticated however examined unfavorable for mycoplasma contamination.
MDBK cells at a confluency of 80% had been contaminated with influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus at a multiplicity of an infection (MOI) of 0.01 in MEM containing 0.5% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and a couple of mM L-glutamine. At 48 h postinfection, cell tradition medium containing virus was collected and cell particles was eliminated by centrifugation at 2,000g for 10 min at 4°C, adopted by 17,000g for 15 min at 4°C.
Virion-derived vRNP purification
Viron-derived vRNP was ready basically as described beforehand . Briefly, cell tradition medium from contaminated cells was loaded onto precooled 30% sucrose cushion (30% sucrose, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA) in thick-walled ultracentrifuge tubes. Virus was pelleted by centrifugation at 105,000g for 1.5 h at 4°C and resuspended in chilled resuspension buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA) at 4°C. Resuspended virus was lysed by incubation in a disruption buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 5% glycerol, 0.5% Igepal, freshly added 20 mg/ml lysophosphatidylcholine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1.5 mM DTT) at 31°C for 30 min with vigorous shaking. The viral lysate was fractionated by centrifugation on a discontinuous glycerol gradient (1 ml every 70%, 50%, 40%, and 33% glycerol in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 150 mM NaCl). The gradient was centrifuged at 250,000g in a Beckman SW55Ti rotor for 4 h at 4°C. Fractions of roughly 250 μl had been collected dropwise from the underside of the tube. Proteins had been analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and silver stained. Round 3 to 4 fractions enriched with vRNP had been pooled and pelleted in an Optimax-XP TLA 100.3 mounted angle rotor in thick-walled polycarbonate tubes at 550,000g for 4 h at 4°C. vRNP pellet was resuspended in vRNP buffer (100 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1× phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)), aliquoted, snap-frozen, and saved at −80°C. The molarity of purified vRNP was estimated by evaluating it to a serial dilution of recombinant viral polymerase of identified focus (S1B Fig).
Plasmids for recombinant protein manufacturing
The genes of the three subunits of influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus polymerase had been codon optimized and synthesized by ThermoFisher and cloned right into a single baculovirus utilizing the MultiBac system . Plasmid expressing the lively website mutant polymerase (D445A/D446A double mutation within the PB1 subunit, PB1a ) was created by site-directed mutagenesis. WT and mutant NP from influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus, in addition to full-length and truncation mutant ANP32 household proteins, had been cloned into pGEX-6P-1 vector (GE Healthcare) with an N-terminal GST tag adopted by a PreScission protease website. Mutant NP plasmids (monomeric: R416A, M; RNA-binding poor: R74A/R75A/R150A/R156A/R160A/R174A/R175A, 8A; and monomeric and RNA-binding poor mutant: the mix of the earlier two, M8A [23–26]) had been generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Plasmids encoding truncated rooster ANP32A 1–149, 1–158, 1–188, 1–208, 1–220, 1–235, and 1–250 had been additionally generated by site-directed mutagenesis.
Recombinant protein expression and purification
Sf9 insect cells had been contaminated with recombinant baculovirus expressing the subunits of the influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus polymerase (WT or PB1a mutant) and harvested 72 h postinfection. The purification of polymerase was carried out as beforehand described . Briefly, cell pellet was lysed by sonication and clarified lysate was incubated with IgG sepharose (Cytiva). After a number of washes and in a single day cleavage by TEV protease, the launched protein was concentrated and utilized on to a Superdex 200 improve 10/300 GL column (Cytiva). Fractions with focused protein had been pooled, concentrated to desired focus, aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and saved at −80°C till additional use. WT and mutant NP from influenza A/NT/60/1968 (H3N2) virus, in addition to full-length and truncation mutant ANP32 household proteins, had been expressed in BL21 (DE3) E. coli pressure and harvested 18 h after being induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl β- d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18°C. All these proteins had been purified as beforehand described . Briefly, cell pellet was lysed by sonication and clarified lysate was incubated with GST sepharose (Cytiva). After a number of washes and in a single day cleavage by PreScission protease, the launched protein was concentrated and utilized on to a Superdex 200 improve 10/300 GL column (Cytiva). Fractions with focused protein had been pooled, concentrated to desired focus, aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and saved at −80°C till additional use.
In vitro vRNP exercise assay
Roughly 100 ng of recombinant vRNP and indicated recombinant proteins diluted in vRNP buffer (100 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1X PMSF) had been combined with 40 ng rabbit globin mRNA (Sigma-Aldrich) as primer donor (in primed response), 1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM GTP, 0.5 mM CTP, 0.5 mM UTP, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and a couple of U μl−1 RNasin (Promega) in a response quantity of 20 μl. After 4-h incubation at 30°C, RNA was extracted utilizing TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) in keeping with the producer’s directions. Roughly 1,000 ng of recombinant polymerase (WT and PB1a), 130 ng of recombinant ANP32B, and 800 ng of recombinant NP (WT, M, 8A, and M8A) had been added when indicated. In titration experiments, 50 ng, 100 ng, 200 ng, 500 ng, 1,000 ng, and a couple of,000 ng of FluPol; 6.5 ng, 13 ng, 26 ng, 65 ng, 130 ng, and 260 ng of ANP32B; and 40 ng, 80 ng, 200 ng, 300 ng, 400 ng, and 800 ng of NP had been used as indicated. In ANP32 household protein titration experiment, 26 ng, 65 ng, and 130 ng of chANP32A; 23 ng, 57 ng, and 114 ng of human huANP32A/B; and 24.5 ng, 61 ng, and 122 ng of huANP32E had been used. In ANP32 protein truncation experiment, 116 ng of 1–250, 108 ng of 1–235, 102 ng of 1–220, 96 ng of 1–208, 86 ng of 1–188, 72 ng of 1–158, and 68 ng of 1–149 had been used (equal mol).
RNA evaluation by primer extension
Whole RNA was extracted utilizing TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) in keeping with the producer’s directions and subjected to primer extension evaluation as beforehand described . In short, RNA was reverse transcribed utilizing Tremendous-Script III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with an extra of 32P-labelled primers particular to section 6 (encoding the neuraminidase (NA)) positive-sense mRNA and cRNA (5′-TCCAGTATGGTTTTGATTTCCG-3′) or vRNA (5′-TGGACTAGTGGGAGCATCAT-3′), section 1 (encoding the polymerase primary 2 protein (PB2)) positive-sense mRNA and cRNA (5′-GCCATCATCCATTTCATCCT-3′) or vRNA (5′-TGCTAATTGGGCAAGGAGAC-3′), section 2 (encoding the polymerase primary 1 protein (PB1)) positive-sense mRNA and cRNA (5′-TCCATGGTGTATCCTGTTCC-3′) or vRNA (5′-TGATTTCGAATCTGGAAGGA-3′), section 5 (encoding the NP) positive-sense mRNA and cRNA (5′-TGATTTCAGTGGCATTCTGG-3′) or vRNA (5′-TGATGGAAAGTGCAAGACCA-3′), section 8 (encoding the nonstructural (NS) proteins) positive-sense mRNA and cRNA (5′-CGCTCCACTATTTGCTTTCC-3′) or vRNA (5′-TGATTGAAGAAGTGAGACACAG-3′). Primer extension merchandise derived from mRNA and cRNA could be distinguished primarily based on measurement due to the presence of globin mRNA-derived sequences at 5′ finish of mRNA. Primer extension merchandise had been separated by 6% w/v denaturing PAGE and visualised by phosphorimaging on an FLA-5000 scanner (Fuji). Quantitation was carried out utilizing ImageJ (Fiji) and evaluation was carried out utilizing Prism 8 (GraphPad). Experiments had been carried out with n = 3 independently purified vRNP preparations. Statistical assessments (unusual one-way ANOVA) had been carried out utilizing Prism 8.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
To check the RNA-binding skill of WT and mutant NP, 140 pmol of a 39 nucleotide-long RNA (5′-AGUAGAAACAAGGCCGUAGAAUGAUGUAUAUGAGACAGA-3′, Dharmacon) was combined with 62, 116, or 232 pmol of WT or mutant NP in binding buffer (25 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 2 mM DTT, 2 U μl-1 RNAsin (Promega)) in a closing quantity of 15.5 μl and incubated on ice for 30 min earlier than being analysed on a ten% native polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained by SYBR Secure (ThermoFisher) to visualise RNA. The experiment was repeated 3 occasions.
S1 Fig. Purification and semi-quantification of vRNP.
(A) Schematic illustrating the glycerol gradient purification of vRNPs remoted from virions produced in MDBK cells. (B) Estimation of vRNP molar focus by means of comparability of vRNP with identified focus of viral polymerase (FluPol). Unique picture could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos.
S2 Fig. Evaluation of purified recombinant viral polymerase (FluPol) and ANP32 household proteins by SDS-PAGE and marking with Coomassie Good Blue.
(A) WT and catalytically inactive (PB1a) FluPol purified from insect cells. (B) ANP32 household proteins together with rooster ANP32A (chANP32A), human ANP32A (huANP32A), human ANP32B (huANP32B), human ANP32E (huANP32E), and C-terminally truncated chANP32A mutants purified from E. coli. * signifies residual cleaved GST tag. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. ANP32, acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; WT, wild sort.
S3 Fig. Evaluation of WT and mutant viral NP by SDS-PAGE and assessing their RNA-binding exercise by EMSA.
(A) WT, RNA-binding poor mutant (8A), monomeric mutant (M), and RNA-binding poor monomeric mutant (M8A) NP proteins had been purified from E. coli. * signifies NP degradation product. (B) Dimension-exclusion chromatography curves of the purification of NP proteins. Dimension markers are proven above the curves. The y-axes had been rescaled to make important peaks of equal heights. (C) RNA-binding exercise of WT and mutant NP assessed by EMSA. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; NP, nucleoprotein; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; WT, wild sort.
S4 Fig. Evaluation of various influenzas A virus segments.
Impact of viral polymerase (FluPol), huANP32B, and NP alone or collectively on vRNP exercise in section 1 (PB2), section 2 (PB1), section 5 (NP), and section 8 (NS), within the presence of globin mRNA as cap donor. A consultant results of RNA evaluation by primer extension is proven. Unique photographs could be present in S1 Uncooked Photos. NP, nucleoprotein; NS, nonstructural; PB1, polymerase primary 1; PB2, polymerase primary 2; vRNP, viral ribonucleoprotein.
We thank Imre Berger (College of Bristol) for the Multibac recombinant baculovirus/insect cell expression system and Weixian Lu (College of Oxford) of the Sf9 insect cells. We additionally thank members of the Fodor and Grimes laboratories for useful discussions and, particularly, Jeremy Keown for encouraging the initiation of this mission, Alex Walker for producing preliminary information, and Jane Sharps for help with culturing and purifying influenza virus and the preparation of vRNP.
Eisfeld AJ, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. On the centre: influenza A virus ribonucleoproteins. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(1):28–41. pmid:25417656; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5619696.
Fodor E, Te Velthuis AJW. Construction and Operate of the Influenza Virus Transcription and Replication Equipment. Chilly Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(9). Epub 2019/12/25. pmid:31871230; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7334866.
Wandzik JM, Kouba T, Cusack S. Construction and Operate of Influenza Polymerase. Chilly Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021;11(9). Epub 2020/04/29. pmid:32341065; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8415296.
Walker AP, Fodor E. Interaction between Influenza Virus and the Host RNA Polymerase II Transcriptional Equipment. Traits Microbiol. 2019;27(5):398–407. pmid:30642766; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6467242.
Zhu Z, Fodor E, Keown JR. A structural understanding of influenza virus genome replication. Traits Microbiol. 2023;31(3):308–319. Epub 20221103. pmid:36336541.
Staller E, Barclay WS. Host Cell Elements That Work together with Influenza Virus Ribonucleoproteins. Chilly Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021;11(11):a038307. Epub 2020/09/30. pmid:32988980; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8559542.
Peacock TP, Sheppard CM, Staller E, Barclay WS. Host Determinants of Influenza RNA Synthesis. Annu Rev Virol. 2019;6(1):215–233. Epub 2019/07/10. pmid:31283439.
Carrique L, Fan H, Walker AP, Keown JR, Sharps J, Staller E, et al. Host ANP32A mediates the meeting of the influenza virus replicase. Nature. 2020;587(7835):638–643. Epub 2020/11/20. pmid:33208942; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7116770.
Wang F, Sheppard CM, Mistry B, Staller E, Barclay WS, Grimes JM, et al. The C-terminal LCAR of host ANP32 proteins interacts with the influenza A virus nucleoprotein to advertise the replication of the viral RNA genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(10):5713–5725. pmid:35639917; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9177957.
Schaack GA, Mehle A. Experimental Approaches to Establish Host Elements Necessary for Influenza Virus. Chilly Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(12). Epub 20201201. pmid:31871241; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7706581.
Vreede FT, Brownlee GG. Influenza virion-derived viral ribonucleoproteins synthesize each mRNA and cRNA in vitro. J Virol. 2007;81(5):2196–2204. pmid:17166911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1865950.
Lengthy JS, Giotis ES, Moncorge O, Frise R, Mistry B, James J, et al. Species distinction in ANP32A underlies influenza A virus polymerase host restriction. Nature. 2016;529(7584):101–104. pmid:26738596; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4710677.
Baker SF, Ledwith MP, Mehle A. Differential Splicing of ANP32A in Birds Alters Its Potential to Stimulate RNA Synthesis by Restricted Influenza Polymerase. Cell Rep. 2018;24(10):2581–2588. e4. Epub 2018/09/06. pmid:30184493; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6157632.
Reilly PT, Yu Y, Hamiche A, Wang L. Cracking the ANP32 whips: necessary capabilities, unequal requirement, and hints at illness implications. Bioessays. 2014;36(11):1062–1071. Epub 20140825. pmid:25156960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4270211.
Domingues P, Hale BG. Purposeful Insights into ANP32A-Dependent Influenza A Virus Polymerase Host Restriction. Cell Rep. 2017;20(11):2538–2546. Epub 2017/09/14. pmid:28903035; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5608968.
Mistry B, Lengthy JS, Schreyer J, Staller E, Sanchez-David RY, Barclay WS. Elucidating the Interactions between Influenza Virus Polymerase and Host Issue ANP32A. J Virol. 2020;94(3). Epub 2019/11/07. pmid:31694956.
Staller E, Sheppard CM, Neasham PJ, Mistry B, Peacock TP, Goldhill DH, et al. ANP32 Proteins Are Important for Influenza Virus Replication in Human Cells. J Virol. 2019;93(17). Epub 2019/06/21. pmid:31217244; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6694824.
Zhang H, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang M, Wang X, Zhang X, et al. Basic Contribution and Host Vary Dedication of ANP32A and ANP32B in Influenza A Virus Polymerase Exercise. J Virol. 2019;93(13). Epub 2019/04/19. pmid:30996088; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6580979.
Turrell L, Lyall JW, Tiley LS, Fodor E, Vreede FT. The position and meeting mechanism of nucleoprotein in influenza A virus ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1591. pmid:23481399.
Beaton AR, Krug RM. Transcription antitermination throughout influenza viral template RNA synthesis requires the nucleocapsid protein and the absence of a 5’ capped finish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(17):6282–6286. pmid:3462695; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC386487.
Shapiro GI, Krug RM. Influenza virus RNA replication in vitro: synthesis of viral template RNAs and virion RNAs within the absence of an added primer. J Virol. 1988;62(7):2285–2290. pmid:2453679; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC253375.
Te Velthuis AJW, Grimes JM, Fodor E. Structural insights into RNA polymerases of negative-sense RNA viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(5):303–318. Epub 2021/01/27. pmid:33495561; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7832423.
Chan WH, Ng AK, Robb NC, Lam MK, Chan PK, Au SW, et al. Purposeful evaluation of the influenza virus H5N1 nucleoprotein tail loop reveals amino acids which might be essential for oligomerization and ribonucleoprotein actions. J Virol. 2010;84(14):7337–7345. Epub 20100512. pmid:20463064; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2898228.
Elton D, Medcalf E, Bishop Ok, Digard P. Oligomerization of the influenza virus nucleoprotein: identification of optimistic and unfavorable sequence parts. Virology. 1999;260(1):190–200. pmid:10405371.
Ye Q, Krug RM, Tao YJ. The mechanism by which influenza A virus nucleoprotein varieties oligomers and binds RNA. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1078–1082. pmid:17151603.
Tang YS, Xu S, Chen YW, Wang JH, Shaw PC. Crystal constructions of influenza nucleoprotein complexed with nucleic acid present insights into the mechanism of RNA interplay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(7):4144–4154. pmid:33784403; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8053115.
Knight ML, Fan H, Bauer DLV, Grimes JM, Fodor E, Keown JR. Construction of an H3N2 influenza virus nucleoprotein. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2021;77(Pt 7):208–214. Epub 2021/07/02. pmid:34196611; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8248822.
Vreede FT, Ng AK, Shaw PC, Fodor E. Stabilization of influenza virus replication intermediates depends on the RNA-binding however not the homo-oligomerization exercise of the viral nucleoprotein. J Virol. 2011;85(22):12073–12078. Epub 20110914. pmid:21917965; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3209277.
York A, Hengrung N, Vreede FT, Huiskonen JT, Fodor E. Isolation and characterization of the positive-sense replicative intermediate of a negative-strand RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(45):E4238–E4245. Epub 2013/10/23. 1315068110 [pii] pmid:24145413; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3831450.
Vreede FT, Jung TE, Brownlee GG. Mannequin suggesting that replication of influenza virus is regulated by stabilization of replicative intermediates. J Virol. 2004;78(17):9568–9572. pmid:15308750; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC506943.
Jorba N, Coloma R, Ortin J. Genetic trans-complementation establishes a brand new mannequin for influenza virus RNA transcription and replication. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(5):e1000462. Epub 2009/05/30. pmid:19478885; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2682650.
Rehwinkel J, Tan CP, Goubau D, Schulz O, Pichlmair A, Bier Ok, et al. RIG-I detects viral genomic RNA throughout negative-strand RNA virus an infection. Cell. 2010;140(3):397–408. Epub 2010/02/11. pmid:20144762.
Weis S, Te Velthuis AJW. Influenza Virus RNA Synthesis and the Innate Immune Response. Viruses. 2021;13(5). Epub 20210428. pmid:33924859; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8146608.
Bieniossek C, Imasaki T, Takagi Y, Berger I. MultiBac: increasing the analysis toolbox for multiprotein complexes. Traits Biochem Sci. 2012;37(2):49–57. ISI:000300923200002. pmid:22154230
Fan H, Walker AP, Carrique L, Keown JR, Serna Martin I, Karia D, et al. Buildings of influenza A virus RNA polymerase supply perception into viral genome replication. Nature. 2019;573(7773):287–290. Epub 2019/09/06. pmid:31485076; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6795553.
Te Velthuis AJ, Robb NC, Kapanidis AN, Fodor E. The position of the priming loop in influenza A virus RNA synthesis. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16029. pmid:27572643.