Analyst: Set!
All people: The place?
Analyst: How ought to I do know? I’ve an existence proof. It’s not constructive.

Topologist: Set!
All people: That’s not a set. You will have two diamonds and a squiggle.
Topologist: I don’t get what you’re saying.
All people: See? The shapes must be all the identical, or all totally different.
Topologist: Like… totally different genus?
All people: No, see, that’s a diamond. That’s a diamond. That’s a squiggle.
Topologist: Your mouth is making sounds however none of them appear to imply something.

Class Theorist: Set!
All people: The place?
Class Theorist: See, right here’s a set that fails due to the textures. Right here’s a set that fails due to the colours. Right here’s a set that fails due to the numbers. And all three of them fail due to the shapes.
All people: That’s only a bunch of failed units.
Class Theorist: Provided that you have a look at the incorrect stage of abstraction.

Likelihood Theorist: Set!
All people: Wait, what?
Likelihood Theorist: The anticipated variety of units is nearly three. The likelihood of a minimum of one is sort of 0.97.
All people: However we haven’t dealt the playing cards but.
Likelihood Theorist: Precisely. When you pattern from the distribution, all bets are off.

Logician: Set!
All people: The place?
Logician: It’s the set of all units that don’t include themselves.
All people: That’s actually all units on this recreation. None of them include themselves.
Logician: Excellent! Then give me all of the playing cards.
All people: “All of the playing cards” isn’t a set.
Logician: Hey, I perceive the temptation to outline “set” narrowly, however I fear this axiomatization isn’t going to get you wherever.

Knowledge Scientist: Set!
All people: The place?
Knowledge Scientist: Two strong squiggles in every colour.
All people: Um, none of these playing cards are exhibiting.
Knowledge Scientist: Okay, the underlying information could have some points, however my evaluation continues to be sound.

Set Theorist: Set!
All people: Okay, earlier than you say something, is it the empt—
Set Theorist: It’s the empty set!