Home Biology Optogenetic cleavage of the Miro GTPase reveals the direct penalties of real-time lack of perform in Drosophila

Optogenetic cleavage of the Miro GTPase reveals the direct penalties of real-time lack of perform in Drosophila

Optogenetic cleavage of the Miro GTPase reveals the direct penalties of real-time lack of perform in Drosophila

[ad_1]

Introduction

Strategies to watch lack of perform (LoF) phenotypes are used to review many organic processes. Though vital instruments for elucidating gene perform, disruption of genes by genomic mutations or RNA interference (RNAi) usually doesn’t have the spatiotemporal decision to seize the direct mobile and organismal penalties of LoF and to report particularly on a protein’s major perform. The noticed “end-point” phenotypes would possibly thus be the results of compensatory mechanisms to lack of protein, and gene pleiotropy signifies that, even in cell tradition fashions, it’s usually troublesome to dissect the causality of the noticed phenotypes.

This concern is very problematic when learning advanced mobile processes resembling mitochondrial dynamics, and it’s significantly evident for Miro proteins, mitochondrial Rho GTPases that affect the motility, morphology, and physiology of mitochondria [13]. In Drosophila, homozygous mutants of miro are developmentally deadly [4], whereas knockout of Miro1 in mice results in perinatal lethality [5,6]. Persistent lack of Miro is detrimental for mitochondrial transport in Drosophila and mammalian neurons [79], the place it results in alteration of synaptic energy [4,10], whereas disruption of Miro in Drosophila moreover impairs mitochondrial calcium homeostasis [11,12]. Lowering Miro abundance has additionally profound results on mitochondrial morphology with fragmented mitochondria noticed in yeast [13], Drosophila larval motor neurons [7], and mouse embryonic fibroblasts [6]. It’s not but clear, nonetheless, to what extent these phenotypes are immediately penalties of Miro disruption and whether or not they would possibly come up independently. Any try and dissect the causality of mobile and organismal phenotypes after Miro manipulation is difficult as the present instruments don’t permit acute disruption of perform.

Right here, we current the technology of “Cut up-Miro,” a photocleavable variant of Drosophila Miro, to attain speedy and managed lack of protein perform. Mitochondrial community remodelling is a speedy response to Cut up-Miro photocleavage in Drosophila S2R+ cells. This impact, mediated by lack of anchorage to the microtubule community, impacts on mitochondrial distribution into cell processes the place the usage of Cut up-Miro reveals that this protein is enough to extend mitochondrial motility however dispensable for the upkeep of elevated mitochondrial velocities. This impact is mirrored in grownup fly neurons in vivo, the place Cut up-Miro impacts the motility, however not the processivity, of the mitochondria. Unexpectedly, we present that Cut up-Miro photocleavage neither immediately impacts mitochondrial calcium homeostasis nor the affiliation between the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum in S2R+ cells. Lastly, we exhibit that Cut up-Miro modulates neuronal exercise in grownup flies, and, by rescuing the lethality related to classical Miro LoF mutations through pan-neuronal expression, we offer proof of idea that Cut up-Miro affords management of fly locomotor exercise via publicity to blue mild.

Outcomes

Design of a photocleavable Miro variant in Drosophila

To achieve real-time spatiotemporal management of Miro LoF, we created a Miro variant that incorporates the LOV2-Zdk1 protein pair (Fig 1A and 1B) that undergoes light-induced dissociation upon publicity to blue mild [1416] and so is predicted to attain speedy and reversible Miro LoF via protein photocleavage (Fig 1B).

thumbnail

Fig 1. Cut up-Miro is a photocleavable model of Drosophila Miro.

(A) Schematic of Cut up-Miro useful domains. (B) Schematic illustration of reconstituted and photocleaved mitochondrial-bound Cut up-Miro in its darkish and lit state, respectively. Cut up-MiroN and Cut up-MiroC moieties will be adopted independently by tagging them with totally different combos of fluorescent proteins (e.g., EGFP/mCherry). (C) Localisation of Cut up-Miro in S2R+ cells cotransfected with mCherry-Cut up-MiroN (magenta) harbouring the T406A, T407A mutations within the N-terminus of LOV2 [15,18], and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroC, earlier than and after a 570-ms pulse of blue mild. Earlier than irradiation, the mCherry and EGFP indicators colocalise, whereas mCherry-Cut up-MiroN is totally launched into the cytoplasm (indicated by the homogenous magenta color) instantly after irradiation (16 seconds), and it totally reconstitutes after 3 minutes. Cartoon depicts photocleavage and reconstitution of mCherry-Cut up-Miro-EGFP at totally different time factors. s, seconds. (D) Quantification of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN fluorescence on the mitochondria and within the cytoplasm earlier than irradiation, on the level of most launch and restoration signifies that the N-terminus moiety is totally launched into the cytoplasm (imply ratio = 1 at launch) and totally reconstituted afterwards. (E) Quantification of EGFP-Cut up-MiroC fluorescence signifies that the localisation of the C-terminus moiety doesn’t change throughout the experiment. (F, G) Quantification of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN half-time launch (F) and restoration (G) after photocleavage, relative to C. In (G), left panel reveals ranges of cytosolic Cut up-Miro N-terminus quantified after the utmost launch is reached; proper panel: restoration half-time. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. Strong line in (G) is exponential curve match. Circles, variety of cells, from 3 impartial experiments. Statistical significance in (D, E) was calculated with a repeated measures one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at. Scale bars: 10 μm. **** p < 0.0001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g001

We fused Zdk1 N-terminally to the mitochondrial focusing on transmembrane area of Miro, with LOV2 fused C-terminally to the remainder of the protein (Fig 1A and 1B), and expressed this optogenetic variant of Miro (herein referred to as “Cut up-Miro”) as 2 elements in Drosophila S2R+ cells (Figs 1B, 1C, and S1A). In absence of blue mild, LOV2 interacts with Zdk1, thus reconstituting Cut up-Miro on the mitochondria (Fig 1C). Nevertheless, upon blue mild publicity, the LOV2 Jα helix undergoes a conformational change that stops Zdk1 from binding [14,15], ensuing within the photocleavage of Cut up-Miro and the whole and speedy launch of the N-terminal moiety into the cytoplasm (Fig 1D–1F and S1 Film). Quantifications of the kinetics of launch after blue mild publicity confirmed launch half-life of 1.6 ± 0.2 seconds (Fig 1F) and full Cut up-Miro reconstitution inside 3 minutes (Fig 1D, 1E and 1G) after elimination of blue mild, in keeping with what was beforehand reported for the LOV2-Zdk1 affiliation in mammalian cells [14,17]. Tagging Cut up-Miro solely on the N-terminus didn’t considerably change the kinetic of photocleavage (S1B–S1G Fig and S2 Film), thus exhibiting the Cut up-Miro design helps a flexible tagging technique to facilitate fluorophore multiplexing.

Overexpression of Cut up-Miro will increase the proportion of motile mitochondria and their processivity in cell processes

Drosophila S2R+ cells are sometimes used for intracellular trafficking experiments [19,20] and will be induced to increase processes (Fig 2A) with a stereotypical plus-end out microtubule array [20,21] that show Miro-dependent long-range, bidirectional mitochondrial motility (Figs 2B–2D and S2A–S2C). With the intention of learning whether or not mitochondrial motility will be manipulated through Cut up-Miro, we first transfected S2R+ cells with both Cut up-Miro or wild-type Miro (wt-Miro) N-terminally tagged with mCherry. We initially exploited the mCherry tag to observe mitochondria with a 561-nm laser line, which doesn’t photocleave Cut up-Miro (Fig 2E–2G; 561-nm laser).

thumbnail

Fig 2. Miro regulates mitochondrial motility within the processes of S2R+ cells, and Cut up-Miro photocleavage reverts the impact of Cut up-Miro overexpression on mitochondrial motility however not velocity.

(A) Instance of S2R+ cell handled with cytochalasin D to induce the formation of microtubule-rich processes. The microtubules and the mitochondria are stained with Tubulin Tracker and with MitoTracker Inexperienced (MitoTracker), respectively. White arrows point out examples of mobile processes containing mitochondria. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Consultant kymographs of mitochondrial transport within the mobile processes of S2R+ cells handled with management (higher panel) or Miro dsRNA (backside panel). Yellow highlights point out examples of quick (<2 μm) and lengthy runs (≥2 μm). Scale bars: 1 μm (distance) and 5 seconds (time). (C) Obligation cycle evaluation describes the common time mitochondria spend on lengthy runs, quick runs, or pausing. For every parameter, all mitochondrial values from every cell had been averaged and in contrast between management and Miro dsRNA situation. (D) Proportion of motile mitochondria in mobile processes. Variety of mitochondria analysed are in brackets, from 29 (Ctrl dsRNA) and 36 (Miro dsRNA) cells, from 2 impartial experiments. Information are proven as imply ± SEM, a number of Pupil t checks (C) and Mann–Whitney take a look at (D). This evaluation means that Miro is important to drive mitochondrial motility in Drosophila S2R+ cells, and that is primarily because of modulation of long-range transport, whereas short-range motility seems to be largely impartial of Miro. (E) Consultant kymographs exhibiting mitochondrial transport in S2R+ mobile processes earlier than and through publicity to blue mild. Management cells had been cotransfected with mCherry-tagged wt-Miro, which can’t be photocleaved, and EGFP focused to the mitochondria through the Zdk1-MiroC anchor (EGFP-mito). Cut up-Miro was tagged with each EGFP and mCherry to independently observe the C-terminal and N-terminal half, respectively. Mitochondrial transport was first imaged with a 561-nm laser, to seize the mCherry sign, after which with a 488-nm laser, to seize the EGFP sign whereas photocleaving Cut up-Miro (S4 and S5 Motion pictures). Cartoon depicts schematic of the transfected constructs. Scale bars: 5 μm (distance) and 30 seconds (time). (F) Obligation cycles evaluation and (G) proportion of motile mitochondria in mobile processes. In (F, G), mitochondrial transport was first analysed following the mCherry tag in cells expressing both mCherry-tagged wt-Miro or Cut up-Miro (561-nm laser). In a separate experiment (488-nm laser), mitochondrial transport was quantified following the EGFP tag in the beginning (first minute) and on the finish (seventh minute) of the time-lapse imaging with 488-nm blue mild, as proven in panel E. In (F), for every parameter, all mitochondrial values from every cell had been averaged and in comparison with the management situation (561-nm laser) or to the primary minute of blue mild publicity (488-nm laser). Information are proven as imply ± SEM, from 3 impartial experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated by one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at (561-nm laser) or a number of paired t checks (488-nm laser) in (F) and by Kruskal–Wallis take a look at adopted by Dunn’s put up hoc take a look at (561-nm laser) or by Mann–Whitney checks (488-nm laser) in (G). Variety of mitochondria analysed are in brackets, from 16 (Management), 15 (wt-Miro), and 15 (Cut up-Miro) cells underneath 561-nm laser, and 11 (wt-Miro) and 17 (Cut up-Miro) cells underneath 488-nm laser. (H) Distribution of anterograde and retrograde long term velocity after wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro overexpression (561-nm laser) and after irradiation with blue mild to photocleave Cut up-Miro (488-nm laser). Strong, dashed, and dotted strains are fitted curves. Statistical significance was calculated with a Kruskal–Wallis take a look at adopted by Dunn’s put up hoc take a look at (561-nm laser) and a Mann–Whitney take a look at (488-nm laser). N = variety of mitochondrial runs. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. (I) Mannequin for Cut up-Miro–mediated regulation of mitochondrial motility. The Cut up-Miro trafficking knowledge are per a mannequin during which 2 totally different swimming pools of mitochondria coexist in S2R+ cells. After overexpression, Cut up-Miro recruits the motor complexes on the mitochondria and prompts transport. On one mitochondrial pool (mitochondrial pool 1), Cut up-Miro hyperlinks immediately or not directly (for instance, through Milton/Trak, not depicted) to the motor proteins. On one other subset of mitochondria (mitochondrial pool 2), the motor complexes are as a substitute stabilised on the organelle by an unknown issue (query mark) following Miro-dependent recruitment. After Cut up-Miro photocleavage, mitochondrial pool 1 can reverse to regulate ranges of processivity or develop into stationary (Fig 2F and 2G). Nevertheless, the processivity (e.g., velocity and run size) of the mitochondrial pool 2 is just not affected because the recruited motors usually are not immediately linked to the mitochondria through Miro (Figs 2H, S2J and S2K). This mannequin is per earlier stories describing Miro-independent mitochondrial motility [6,24]. Cut up-Miro–dependent recruitment of motor complexes on an interconnected mitochondrial community, such because the one discovered within the perinuclear space of the cell soma, might trigger important stress on the community. Releasing the Cut up-Miro anchor by photocleavage, even when solely on a subset of the mitochondria, could be enough to launch the strain and trigger mitochondrial community retraction, as proven in Fig 3. Not depicted, dynein motor advanced. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g002

Miro hyperlinks kinesin and dynein motors to mitochondria through milton (TRAK1/2 in mammals) [8,9,2225] (S2D and S2E Fig), and so overexpression of Miro is predicted to favour the recruitment of motor proteins on mitochondria for processive transport. In line with this concept, mitochondria spent extra time on lengthy runs, paused much less, and engaged much less steadily briefly runs after both Miro or Cut up-Miro overexpression in comparison with controls (Fig 2F, 561-nm laser, and S2F and S2G Fig). Thus, each Miro isoforms flip the motility of mitochondria from predominantly bidirectional with frequent reversals to markedly extra processive. Additional supporting this notion, each Miro isoforms brought on a better proportion of mitochondria in cells processes to be motile (Fig 2G, 561-nm laser), and their responsibility cycle elevated in each the anterograde and retrograde instructions (S2H Fig), suggesting that Miro participates within the activation of transport complexes for bidirectional mitochondrial transport. Curiously, whereas there was no distinction within the retrograde run velocities when Miro or Cut up-Miro had been overexpressed, mitochondria touring within the anterograde path moved at almost double the pace when in comparison with management (Fig 2H, 561-nm laser). This commentary would possibly replicate a choice for Miro to recruit milton-kinesin complexes, per what was noticed in larval segmental neurons after Miro overexpression [26]. Collectively, these experiments make clear Miro’s position in regulating mitochondrial motility in S2R+ cells and exhibit that, in absence of blue mild publicity, Cut up-Miro and Miro are functionally equal.

Optogenetic cleavage of Cut up-Miro reduces the proportion, however not the processivity, of motile mitochondria within the cell processes

To check whether or not Cut up-Miro photocleavage reverses the noticed Miro gain-of-function results on mitochondrial transport, we analysed mitochondrial motility underneath blue mild in wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro transfected cells. Time-lapse imaging with the 488-nm laser line ensured that Cut up-Miro was not reconstituted whereas recording mitochondrial motility through the EGFP-tag (Fig 2E, inexperienced). wt-Miro, which can’t be photocleaved, was used as a management. We discovered that whereas there was no detectable distinction within the motility after imaging for 1 minute (S2I Fig), sustained Cut up-Miro photocleavage (7 minutes) lowered the time mitochondria spent on lengthy runs and the proportion of organelles within the processes that had been motile to the degrees noticed previous to overexpression, whereas there was no such impact in wt-Miro controls (Fig 2E–2G, 488-nm laser). Cleaving Cut up-Miro from mitochondria didn’t, nonetheless, have any main results on the rate and run size of the transferring organelles, which remained elevated and didn’t return to regulate ranges (Fig 2H, 488-nm laser, and S2J Fig). This was additionally the case when endogenous Miro was depleted within the Cut up-Miro situation by RNAi (S2K Fig). Thus, utilizing a technique combining up-regulation (through overexpression) and down-regulation (through Cut up-Miro photocleavage), these outcomes point out that the proportion and processivity of motile mitochondria are managed by separate Miro-dependent and Miro-independent mechanisms (Fig 2I).

Cut up-Miro photocleavage triggers a speedy collapse of the mitochondrial community, which is rescued by mitochondrial anchoring to the microtubules

We subsequent examined the impact of Cut up-Miro on the integrity of the mitochondrial community within the cell soma. Strikingly, exposing Cut up-Miro-transfected S2R+ cells to blue mild triggered a speedy (<3 minutes) and dramatic remodelling of your complete mitochondrial community, which progressively collapsed in direction of the centre of the cell (Fig 3A and S3 Film). Mitochondria shortened alongside their lengthy axis taking on a rounder form (Fig 3B), which was related to a robust discount within the variety of branches (Fig 3C) and discount of the full space coated by mitochondria (S3A Fig). Once more, the presence of endogenous Miro was dispensable for Cut up-Miro performance as lowering Miro ranges by RNAi didn’t have an effect on the mitochondrial phenotype in Cut up-Miro–transfected cells (Fig 3D). This phenotype is just not depending on antagonistic results attributable to elevated cytoplasmic focus of Cut up-MiroN, as overexpression of the Miro N-terminal moiety alone, which diffuses all through the cytoplasm, doesn’t trigger any gross mitochondrial morphological aberration (S3B Fig and [24,25]). Of notice, neither the motility and distribution of peroxisomes within the cell processes (S3C and S3D Fig) nor the general organisation of the microtubule community (S3E Fig) had been affected by this speedy cellular-scale change. Nonetheless, we reasoned that mitochondrial community collapse would possibly impede organelle supply in direction of the periphery. The variety of mitochondria within the cell processes confirmed a progressive decline in mitochondrial content material in cells expressing Cut up-Miro underneath blue mild, whereas no impact was noticed within the presence of wt-Miro (S3F and S3G Fig). We conclude that the speedy mitochondrial form transition with related lack of community integrity, clearly detectable inside 3 minutes underneath blue mild, strongly contributes to the progressive depletion of mitochondria from the cell processes.

thumbnail

Fig 3. Cut up-Miro–dependent modifications of mitochondrial morphology and connectivity are rescued by SNPH expression.

(A) Consultant photographs of mitochondria in Drosophila S2R+ cells in the beginning (0 minutes) and after 3 and seven minutes of publicity to blue mild, which results in Cut up-Miro, however not wt-Miro, photocleavage. Management cells (high panels) had been cotransfected with mCherry-tagged wt-Miro (magenta) and EGFP focused to the mitochondria through the Zdk1-MiroC anchor (EGFP-mito, gray). Cut up-Miro (backside panels) was tagged with each EGFP and mCherry to independently observe the C-terminal and N-terminal half, respectively. The mCherry is proven in the beginning and finish of the imaging interval to substantiate retention on and launch from the mitochondria in wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro transfected cells, respectively, underneath blue mild. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Quantification of mitochondrial side ratio (AR) and (C) of the variety of mitochondrial branches throughout the community, relative to A. (D) Quantifications of the mitochondrial collapse phenotype after 7 minutes of time-lapse imaging with 488-nm blue mild in S2R+ cells overexpressing wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro with or and not using a Miro dsRNA assemble (MiroRNAi). Variety of cells: wt-Miro = 15, Cut up-Miro = 15, Cut up-Miro + MiroRNAi = 10, Fisher’s precise take a look at. (E) Consultant photographs of cells expressing mCherry-Cut up-Miro (Cut up-Miro, yellow) with both an empty vector (high panels) or with EGFP-SNPH (SNPH, backside panels, gray) and stained with MitoTracker DeepRed (MTDR, magenta). White arrows present examples of mitochondria which have retracted after Cut up-Miro photocleavage. Diffuse cytoplasmic yellow sign signifies launch of Cut up-Miro N-terminus from the mitochondria. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E’) Magnified inset reveals examples of steady SNPH-positive mitochondria (white arrowheads) and dynamic mitochondrial membranes devoid of SNPH (magenta arrowheads). Scale bar: 2 μm. Not proven, Cut up-Miro. (F) Quantification of mitochondrial AR and (G) variety of mitochondrial branches on the time factors indicated, relative to E. Circles characterize the common AR calculated from single mitochondria throughout the similar cell (B, F) and the common variety of branches per cell normalised to the common group worth (Cut up-Miro, Cut up-Miro + SNPH) at time level 0 (C, G). Comparability throughout time factors was carried out by repeated measures one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at (B, C, F) and Friedman take a look at adopted by Dunn’s put up hoc take a look at (G), from 3 impartial experiments. Information are reported as imply ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g003

The Miro-milton-motor advanced gives a hyperlink for the attachment of mitochondria onto the microtubules [27,28]. To check the speculation that lack of microtubule tethering is chargeable for the collapse of the mitochondrial community, we got down to induce mitochondrial tethering to the microtubules in a Miro-independent method. In mammals, syntaphilin (SNPH) anchors mitochondria onto the microtubules [29], though a Drosophila homologue has not but been discovered. Thus, we coexpressed EGFP-tagged human SNPH with Cut up-Miro in S2R+ cells stained with MitoTracker. SNPH sign in Drosophila cells overlaps with mitochondria and, as noticed in mammalian neurons, SNPH puncta usually localise at mitochondrial ends and are related to sturdy discount in mitochondrial dynamics (Figs 3E–3E’, S3H and S3I). Whereas in cells devoid of SNPH the mitochondrial community retracts after Cut up-Miro photocleavage, the presence of SNPH prevents this phenotype (Fig 3E–3G). These observations help the notion that lack of mitochondrial anchoring on microtubules is chargeable for the speedy mitochondrial community collapse when Cut up-Miro is cleaved.

Cut up-Miro photocleavage doesn’t have an effect on mitochondrial calcium buffering or mitochondria-ER affiliation

Mitochondria buffer calcium to assist keep mobile homeostasis and lack of Miro reduces calcium ranges within the mitochondria of the Drosophila mind [11,12,30]. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying decreased calcium uptake when Miro is disrupted usually are not understood. In S2R+ cells, Cut up-Miro photocleavage didn’t induce any modifications within the fluorescent depth of the mitochondrial calcium [Ca2+]m indicator mito-GCaMP6f when in comparison with management cells (Fig 4A and 4B), indicating that the steady-state stage of [Ca2+]m is just not affected by this manipulation. Optogenetic inactivation of Cut up-Miro additionally didn’t have an effect on [Ca2+]m uptake when S2R+ cells had been challenged with ionomycin, an ionophore that causes a pointy enhance in cytosolic calcium [27,31] (Fig 4C–4E). This outcome signifies that the mitochondrial morphological modifications induced by Cut up-Miro usually are not enough to change [Ca2+]m homeostasis. Likewise, overexpression of SNPH, which rescues the Cut up-Miro–induced mitochondrial collapse, didn’t have any impact on [Ca2+]m uptake when Cut up-Miro was cleaved (Fig 4C–4E).

thumbnail

Fig 4. Cut up-Miro photocleavage doesn’t have an effect on [Ca2+]m abundance.

(A) Consultant picture of an S2R+ cell exhibiting mitochondrial focusing on of mito-GCaMP6f (cyan) within the perinuclear area (white arrows) and in single mitochondria (arrowheads). Yellow is mCherry-tagged wt-Miro (wt-Miro); magenta is MitoTracker DeepRed (MTDR). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Cells transfected with mito-GCaMP6f and both mCherry-wt-Miro (wt-Miro) or mCherry-Cut up-Miro (Cut up-Miro) had been stained with MTDR; and the ratio of mito-GCaMP6f/MTDR sign depth was analysed in the beginning (first minute) and on the finish (seventh minute) of the time-lapse imaging underneath blue mild. Variety of cells: wt-Miro = 12, Cut up-Miro = 16; from 3 impartial experiments. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at didn’t present any important distinction between teams, indicating that the basal [Ca2+]m doesn’t considerably change after Cut up-Miro photocleavage. (C) Expression of mCherry-Cut up-Miro (Cut up-Miro) or EBFP-SNPH (SNPH) doesn’t considerably alter [Ca2+]m uptake in cells challenged with ionomycin, in comparison with management circumstances. Traces point out the common mito-GCaMP6f fluorescence depth values (circles) at particular person time level earlier than and after cell publicity to ionomycin (arrow). N = variety of cells, from 5 impartial experiments. (D, E) Normalised response peak and time to succeed in the height, respectively, relative to the info proven in (C). Circles, variety of cells. Kruskal–Wallis take a look at adopted by Dunn’s a number of comparisons confirmed no distinction between circumstances. (F) wt-Miro or Cut up-Miro (magenta) had been coexpressed with the ER-mito::SPLICS probe (cyan) in S2R+ cells. The SPLICS probe shows a typical punctuated stain in these cells, as beforehand noticed in mammalian and Drosophila cells [34,36]. (G, H) Quantification of the SPLICS puncta and statistical evaluation by Wilcoxon take a look at confirmed no important distinction between the start (first minute) and the top (seventh minute) of the time-lapse imaging underneath blue mild in wild-type and Cut up-Miro–transfected cells. Information are introduced as % change of SPLICS puncta at seventh minute in comparison with first minute. Variety of contacts analysed are in brackets from 5 (wt-Miro) and 9 (Cut up-Miro) cells from 2 impartial experiments. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g004

It has been proven {that a} subset of Miro is discovered on the mitochondria-ER interface to control the contacts between these 2 organelles [12,32,33], and the mitochondria-ER contacts websites (MERCS) are identified to mediate Ca2+ change between the two organelles [34]. Nevertheless, we didn’t detect any important distinction within the variety of MERCS visualised utilizing a split-GFP assay [35,36] after Cut up-Miro photocleavage (Fig 4F–4H). Moreover, the morphological modifications displayed by mitochondria after Cut up-Miro photocleavage weren’t related to detectable modifications of their membrane potential (S4 Fig), implying that mitochondria don’t develop into dysfunctional throughout this speedy morphological transition. Collectively, these findings counsel that acutely modulating mitochondrial community integrity through Cut up-Miro/SNPH or blocking mitochondrial motility through SNPH (S3F and S3G Fig) usually are not enough to perturb [Ca2+]m homeostasis on this context.

In vivo regulation of mitochondrial motility by Cut up-Miro

To achieve perception into the in vivo roles of Cut up-Miro in regulating mitochondrial dynamics, we expressed UAS-mCherry-MiroN-LOV2 and UAS-EGFP-Zdk1-MiroC (herein “UAS-Cut up-Miro”) with the Appl-Gal4 driver and imaged mitochondrial motility within the axons of the grownup wing neurons in situ [37]. Cut up-Miro is reconstituted in grownup fly neurons and will be photocleaved effectively via publicity to blue mild (S5A–S5D Fig). Overexpression of Miro in Drosophila neurons in vivo has been proven to be detrimental for mitochondrial motility and total neuronal viability [7,20]. Nevertheless, expressing Cut up-Miro and the wt-Miro management in a miro+/− background is permissive in direction of mitochondrial motility (Figs 5A, 5B, S5E and S5F and S6 Film). Monitoring of mitochondrial actions revealed that, whereas exposing the UAS-wt-Miro+ neurons to pulses of blue laser mild didn’t trigger any change within the variety of motile mitochondria in 2-day-old flies (Fig 5A and 5C and S6 Film), UAS-Cut up-Miro+ neurons confirmed a robust decline after 5 minutes (Fig 5B and 5D). Mitochondrial velocity and run size, nonetheless, weren’t affected by this manipulation (Fig 5E and 5F), equally to what noticed in S2R+ cells after Cut up-Miro photocleavage. Curiously, 7-day-old UAS-Cut up-Miro+ neurons didn’t present any modifications in mitochondrial motility underneath the identical experimental circumstances (S5E–S5H Fig). This implies that in older flies, when the charges of mitochondrial transport are identified to say no [20,38], various mechanisms would possibly develop into predominant in direction of controlling mitochondrial trafficking.

thumbnail

Fig 5. Cut up-Miro–dependent management of mitochondrial motility in vivo.

(A, B) Stills from films of GFP-labelled mitochondria in wing neuronal axons expressing UAS-wt-Miro (A) or UAS-Cut up-Miro (B) in miroSd32/+ background throughout the first minute (high panels) and fifth minute (backside panels) of blue mild publicity. Traces of transported mitochondria in corresponding films are overlayed onto the photographs. (C, D) Variety of motile mitochondria captured in a 50-μm axonal tract in wing neurons expressing UAS-wt-Miro (C) or UAS-Cut up-Miro (D). Bar charts present the common mitochondrial content material at every time level. Crammed circles characterize the variety of mitochondria inside every axonal bundle at minute 1 and 5. Information had been analysed by paired Pupil t take a look at. Variety of wings analysed: UAS-wt-Miro = 8, UAS-Cut up-Miro = 8, from 2 impartial experiments. (E, F) Anterograde velocity (E) and run size (F) of axonal mitochondria in wing neurons expressing UAS-wt-Miro or UAS-Cut up-Miro, throughout the first and fifth minute of blue mild publicity, relative to (C, D). Because of the total decrease variety of bidirectional and retrograde-moving mitochondria, a significant statistical evaluation of their velocity and run size is just not potential. Circles characterize tracked mitochondria. Information imply ± SEM, Mann–Whitney take a look at. *** p < 0.001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g005

Cut up-Miro controls neuronal exercise in vivo

Having noticed a robust discount in mitochondrial trafficking in 2-day-old Cut up-Miro flies, we subsequent requested whether or not speedy Cut up-Miro photocleavage might have an effect on wider neuronal physiology. Diminished mitochondrial motility has been related to alterations in neuronal exercise [4,10,39,40]. Thus, we determined to measure the exercise of grownup wing neurons by recording spontaneous Ca2+ transient with the GCaMP5 Ca2+ indicator (Fig 6A and 6B). As performed for the trafficking experiment, we expressed Cut up-Miro and the wt-Miro management in a miro+/− background and recorded basal neuronal responses underneath publicity to blue laser mild. We discovered that UAS-Cut up-Miro+ neurons displayed a milder and slower response in comparison with UAS-wt-Miro+ management neurons (Fig 6C–6E). Curiously, the dampened neuronal firing was offset by an enlarged space of lively neurons (Fig 6F), suggesting that Cut up-Miro photocleavage induced distributed community efficiency, which characterises neural ensembles and manifolds [41,42].

thumbnail

Fig 6. Basal neuronal exercise is affected by Cut up-Miro.

(A, B) Examples of spontaneous bouts of neuronal exercise, indicated by transient fluorescence enhance of the GCaMP5 Ca2+ indicator within the cell physique (A) and axonal bundle (B) of grownup wing neurons. White circle, neuronal soma (A). In (B), the arrows point out a single axon throughout the axonal bundle. Scale bars: 5 μm. (C) Pan-neuronal expression of UAS-Cut up-Miro considerably reduces the amplitude of Ca2+ transients, in comparison with UAS-wt-Miro. Traces point out the common GCaMP5 fluorescence depth at particular person time factors in neuronal axons. N = variety of bouts of exercise from 16 wings (UAS-wt-Miro = 8; UAS-Cut up-Miro = 8) and a pair of impartial experiments. (D, E) Peak of GCaMP fluorescence expressed as fluorescence fold enhance from baseline (D) and time to succeed in the height (E). Circles, mixed bouts of exercise from neuronal soma and axons, relative to (A-C). Information are imply ± SEM, Mann Whitney take a look at. (F) Quantification of the variety of lively neuronal areas after 5 minutes of time-lapse imaging with 488-nm blue mild in UAS-wt-Miro and UAS-Cut up-Miro flies. The variety of neuronal areas (cell our bodies and axons) that reply had been counted in 16 (UAS-wt-Miro) and 15 (UAS-Cut up-Miro) fields of view, Fisher’s precise take a look at. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Discuss with S3 Desk for full genotypes. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g006

Inducible hyperactivity of Cut up-Miro flies is exacerbated by age

Genetic mutations and RNAi have proven that Miro is vital for mitochondrial performance within the nervous system [5,7,8]. Homozygous miro gene lack of perform alleles are deadly, thus precluding a complete evaluation of Miro perform in grownup animals. Conditional lack of Miro1 in mouse neurons causes extreme motion defects inside 30 days postnatal [5], and each elevated and lowered Miro abundance within the Drosophila nervous system can rescue fly climbing exercise in fashions of neurodegeneration [43,44]. These findings counsel that real-time Miro disruption within the grownup nervous system may very well be exploited to control animal behaviour.

Having demonstrated that Cut up-Miro impacts mitochondrial performance in S2R+ cells and neuronal physiology in vivo, we turned to behavioural genetics to evaluate Cut up-Miro versatility for the research of organismal phenotypes. Pan-neuronal expression of UAS-mCherry-MiroN-LOV2 and UAS-Zdk1-MiroC (“UAS-Cut up-Miro”) with the Appl-Gal4 driver rescued the lethality related to traditional null mutations of the Miro gene (miroSd32/B682) (Figs 7A and S5A). Grownup flies had been assayed for his or her motor behaviour at day 2 and day 8 earlier than, throughout, and after blue mild publicity utilizing the “Opto-DART” system (Fig 7B). miroSd32/B682, UAS-Cut up-Miro flies at 2 days of age confirmed a modest enhance in locomotor exercise after an hour of publicity to blue mild, which was sustained additionally after the publicity to mild ceased (Fig 7C–7E). These observations counsel that the results of Cut up-Mito photocleavage weren’t quickly reversed after elimination of blue mild.

thumbnail

Fig 7. Optogenetic management of Drosophila locomotor behaviour in Cut up-Miro flies.

(A) Grownup miroSd32/B682 flies eclosed after Appl-Gal4-driven expression of UAS-wt-Miro, UAS-Cut up-Miro or UAS-Cut up-Miro + UAS-EGFP-SNPH (UAS-SNPH) had been counted from 6, 5, and three impartial crosses, respectively. Information are reported as proportion of flies anticipated from mendelian ratios. Information are imply ± SEM, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at confirmed no statistical distinction. (B) Schematic of the “Opto-DART” behavioural setup consisting of a custom-made optogenetic enclosure geared up with LEDs for blue mild stimulation and a digital camera to document fly exercise. Flies are transferred to a 1D platform for automated recording of exercise utilizing the DART system [45,46]. DAC: Digital-to-Analog Converter for multiplatform integration. (C-H) Total exercise, motion initiation, and common pace of 2-day-old flies (C-E) and 8-day-old flies (F-H) expressing UAS-wt-Miro or UAS-Cut up-Miro, earlier than, throughout, and after blue mild publicity (shaded blue rectangles). In (C) and (F), the common exercise of flies expressing UAS-wt-Miro vs. UAS-Cut up-Miro is: earlier than mild publicity, 3.78% ± 0.94 vs. 2.34% ± 0.72 (p = 0.11) (C) and 5.62% ± 1.02 vs. 8.7% ±1.81 (p = 0.14) (F); underneath blue mild, 9.52% ± 0.96 vs. 7.32% ± 0.81 (p = 0.13) (C) and eight.45% ± 0.82 vs. 21.87% ± 2.07**** (F); after blue mild publicity, 3.36% ± 1.18 vs. 7.85% ± 1.96 (p = 0.13) (C) and three.23% ± 1.1 vs. 13.19% ± 2.39** (F). (I, Ok) Total exercise, motion initiation, and common pace of 8-day-old flies expressing UAS-Cut up-Miro or UAS-Cut up-Miro + UAS-SNPH, earlier than, throughout, and after blue mild publicity (shaded blue rectangles). In (I), the general exercise of flies expressing UAS-Cut up-Miro vs. UAS-Cut up-Miro + UAS-SNPH is: 6.09% ± 0.89 vs. 0.95% ± 0.35**** earlier than mild publicity; 18.62% ± 1.4 vs. 3.55% ± 0.75**** underneath blue mild; 9.9% ± 1.4 vs. 3.91% ± 1.25* after blue mild publicity. In (C-Ok), n = variety of flies. Values are means ± SEM, Mann–Whitney take a look at (C, F, I) and a number of unpaired t take a look at (D, E, G, H, J, Ok) with Holm–Sidak correction for a number of comparisons. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.g007

Strikingly, 8-day-old miroSd32/B682, UAS-Cut up-Miro flies displayed a speedy and sustained enhance in motor exercise when uncovered to blue mild in comparison with management, whereas no distinction was noticed of their baseline exercise previous to publicity to blue mild (Fig 7F–1H). Whereas the fly pace returned to regulate stage because the blue mild was turned off, the motion initiation revealed a protracted impact on locomotor exercise, just like what noticed in youthful flies (Fig 7F–1H). Remarkably, Cut up-Miro–dependent results on fly exercise and motion initiation may very well be reversed by coexpressing human SNPH (UAS-SNPH) with Appl-Gal4 (Fig 7I–1K). Thus, SNPH also can suppress the impact of Miro inactivation within the context of animal behaviour. Collectively, these outcomes present that acute lack of Miro perform results in fly hyperactivity, and this phenotype is exacerbated by ageing and suppressed by expression of SNPH. Collectively, these experiments reveal that Cut up-Miro is efficient in an grownup animal and uncover a beforehand unknown position of Miro within the regulation of Drosophila locomotor behaviour.

Dialogue

Utilizing optogenetics to implement a real-time LoF paradigm by focusing on Miro, we present that collapse of the mitochondrial community is an instantaneous response to Miro photocleavage in S2R+ cells, which temporally precedes the defects noticed in mitochondrial trafficking. We discovered that Miro overexpression will increase the proportion and the processivity of mitochondria transported within the processes of S2R+ cells. Surprisingly, though sustained Cut up-Miro photocleavage reverted the proportion of transported mitochondria to regulate ranges, the velocities and run lengths of the motile organelles had been largely unaffected. Curiously, Cut up-Miro photocleavage decreases the quantity, however not the velocities and run size, of motile mitochondria in grownup fly neurons in vivo, suggesting {that a} probably related mechanism would possibly account for the regulation of mitochondrial motility within the processes of S2R+ cells and in grownup neurons. This state of affairs is per a vital position for Miro within the recruitment of transport complexes for activation of bidirectional transport, seemingly by recruiting [47,48] or immediately activating [49] molecular motor complexes. Nevertheless, we hypothesise that when motors have been recruited onto mitochondria, they could hyperlink to the organelles through further components in a Miro-independent manner, not less than on a proportion of mitochondria (Fig 2I). Future research ought to deal with discovering these components, for instance, by testing if the useful homologs of metaxins [50] in Drosophila might fulfil this position.

We beforehand confirmed that mitochondrial motility declines with age within the axons of Drosophila neurons [20,38], which will be partly rescued by boosting the cAMP/PKA signalling pathways and the abundance of the kinesin-1 motor protein [38]. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying transport decline are nonetheless not clear. Within the present research, we noticed that Cut up-Miro photocleavage decreases mitochondrial motility in 2-day-old flies whereas there was no impact in 7-day-old flies. This result’s intriguing because it means that, whereas vital to keep up transport in younger flies, Miro is basically dispensable to maintain the much less ample transport sometimes noticed at later phases [20], implying that Miro-independent mechanisms could develop into predominant.

Speedy retraction of the mitochondrial community within the cell soma after Cut up-Miro photocleavage is conceivably a consequence of releasing membrane stress that accumulates underneath stretch, harking back to the recoil of daughter mitochondria after fission [51]. Elevated mitochondrial stress following Miro overexpression is per the concept extra motors are recruited and pull onto the mitochondrial membrane through cytoskeletal interplay [5255], which might seemingly contribute to the buildup of mechanical vitality onto an interconnected community. In accordance with this view, releasing the hyperlink between mitochondria and the microtubules then triggers the speedy collapse of the community. It might be fascinating in future investigations to determine whether or not the phenotype that we observe may very well be thought to be a “mitoquake,” i.e., speedy mitochondrial community disruption with related launch of mechanical vitality, just like the sudden cytoskeletal rearrangements (“cytoquakes”) that had been proposed to underpin mechanical adaptivity throughout mobile dynamic processes [56].

We discovered that utilizing SNPH to tether mitochondria onto the microtubule community prevented Cut up-Miro–induced mitochondrial reorganisation, indicating that Miro stabilises the mitochondrial community by offering an anchor to the cytoskeleton. It’s potential, nonetheless, that Miro could stabilise the mitochondrial community by concurrently bridging mitochondria to totally different mobile buildings. On this regard, we didn’t discover that the actin cytoskeleton performs a big position in S2R+ cells (S6 Fig), though it’s conceivable that the actin community contributes to mitochondrial stability through Miro-Myosin interactions in different cell varieties [6,5759]. We confirmed that Cut up-Miro photocleavage doesn’t have an effect on mitochondria-ER contacts utilizing a split-GFP reporter, suggesting that the associations mitochondria set up with the ER don’t considerably contribute to the steadiness of the mitochondrial community. Testing whether or not Miro-dependent mitochondrial interplay with different mobile buildings is important to keep up mitochondrial community stability is a objective for future research.

Lowering the abundance of Miro by RNAi lowered [Ca2+]m ranges within the neurons of Drosophila mind [11,12], and mutating the Ca2+-binding EF domains of Miro lowered [Ca2+]m uptake in mouse hippocampal neurons [60], though Miro1-KO and Miro-EF mutant MEFs didn’t present any disturbances in [Ca2+]m homoeostasis [5,27]. In S2R+ cells, shedding Cut up-Miro useful domains (together with the Ca2+-binding EF-hands motifs) didn’t have any impact on [Ca2+]m uptake. We hypothesise that impaired [Ca2+]m homeostasis proven with classical Miro LoF approaches (i.e., RNAi, knockout) could also be a secondary impact of Miro LoF, probably a consequence of sustained morphological and transport defects of mitochondria. Nevertheless, as a result of Miro was proven to work together with MCU and the Sam/MICOS complexes [31,32], presumably through direct interplay with the Miro transmembrane area, we can not exclude that the quick mitochondrial focusing on sequence would possibly nonetheless mediate [Ca2+]m homeostasis. Our discovering that MERCS weren’t affected by Cut up-Miro photocleavage helps the concept [Ca2+]m uptake, identified to be regulated by MERCS, is just not a major position of Miro on this context.

Overexpressing SNPH to rescue Cut up-Miro–dependent mitochondrial community retraction additionally didn’t have an effect on [Ca2+]m uptake. As a result of SNPH additionally locks mitochondria right into a stationary state with little community dynamic, these outcomes elevate the intriguing risk that mitochondrial actions usually are not vital to keep up [Ca2+]m homeostasis, so long as mitochondria keep their performance.

Elegant strategies for light-induced repositioning of trafficked vesicles and mitochondria have been developed, that are primarily based on the recruitment of truncated types of motor proteins to overpower the endogenous transport equipment and so to attain managed redistribution of mobile cargoes [6164]. Engineering the LOV2-Zdk1 area into subunits of motor and adaptor proteins might supply a complementary technique for learning intracellular trafficking when a real-time LoF method is most popular. As a result of protein photocleavage is reversible, the LOV2-Zdk1 methodology additionally gives important benefits over present strategies primarily based on the speedy, nonreversible, degradation of a goal protein by the proteasome, such because the degron [65] or the TRIM-away methods [66].

Opsin-based optogenetic approaches to activate/repress particular neurons and research related animal behaviour have been extensively utilized in dwell animals [67]. A LOV2-controlled CaMKII inhibitor was used to impair reminiscence formation in dwell mice after blue mild stimulation for 1 hour [68]. By creating Cut up-Miro flies, we mix optogenetics with Drosophila behaviour and neuronal specificity to carry out LoF experiments in grownup animals in actual time. Though the locomotor behaviour of Cut up-Miro flies is indistinguishable from the wild-type counterpart earlier than publicity to blue mild, their exercise is enhanced underneath blue mild, and this hyperactivity turns into extra pronounced with age.

The mechanisms underlying the exacerbated hyperactivity phenotype in older flies are unexplained. It’s conceivable that the alteration of neuronal exercise noticed in younger Cut up-Miro flies is linked to an acute imbalance of synaptic transmission and results in augmented locomotor exercise. We speculate that, in older flies, a probably compromised mobile state would possibly contribute to amplify this response. In step with this notion, ageing has been related to elevated exercise of excitatory neurons in C. elegans, flies, and mice [6972]. We’re conscious that we carried out these experiments within the wing neurons of the flies, and, though these cells can relay indicators to have an effect on motor phenotypes [73,74], we’re cautious to not generalise our findings to all neurons within the fly.

The noticed discount in mitochondrial axonal transport induced by Cut up-Miro can also be a contributing issue in direction of enhanced fly exercise, not less than in younger flies, by inflicting an imbalance in neuronal exercise. It’s identified that lowering mitochondrial quantity positively correlates with activity-dependent vesicular launch on the presynapses of hippocampal and cortical neurons [10,39] and with miniature excitatory junction potentials on the Drosophila NMJ [4]. On this view, the outstanding rescue of Cut up-Miro–induced hyperactivity in older animals by SNPH overexpression might conceivably happen through additional discount of the remaining mitochondrial transport in older neurons or through a direct impact on synaptic mitochondria [40]. Total, our knowledge level to an vital position of neuronal mitochondrial mobility for animal behaviour and counsel that Miro might play an important position in stopping hyperexcitation within the ageing nervous system with potential ramification within the context of neurodegeneration.

Supplies and strategies

Era of plasmid DNA

The brand new constructs produced on this research are reported in S1 Desk and had been generated both via restriction enzymes mediated cloning or NEBuilder HiFi DNA Meeting (NEB) utilizing the primers listed in S2 Desk. The plasmid inserts had been amplified by PCR utilizing the Q5 Scorching-Begin Excessive-Constancy 2X Grasp Combine (NEB). Web site-directed mutagenesis was carried out utilizing the Q5 Web site-directed mutagenesis package (NEB) following the producer’s directions. The constancy of all assembled constructs was verified by Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics).

Drosophila husbandry and technology of transgenic flies

The fly strains used on this research are listed in S3 Desk. Flies had been maintained on “Iberian” meals [70 mg/ml yeast (Brewer’s yeast, MP Biomedicals, 903312), 55 mg/ml glucose (VWR, 10117HV), 7.7 mg/ml agar (SLS, FLY1020), 35 mg/ml organic plain white flour (Doves Farm, UK), 1.2 mg/ml Nipagin (Sigma, H3647), 0.4% propionic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, P5561] at 25°C and 60% humidity with a 12-hour mild–12-hour darkish cycle.

The transgenic fly strains generated on this research had been obtained by phiC31-mediated transgenesis to combine the related constructs into both the attP40 (25C6) or attP2 (68A4) touchdown websites following embryo injection.

Western blotting

Samples had been loaded on a NuPAGE 4% to 12% Bis-Tris protein gel and transferred onto an Immobilion PVDF membrane (Merk-Millipore) for 1 hour at 35 V in a moist switch equipment buffered with 12.5 mM Trizma-Base (Sigma), 96 mM glycine (Sigma), 10% methanol (Fisher Chemical substances). The membrane was incubated in blocking resolution [5% milk in PBST (PBS (pH 7.4) with 0.1% Tween-20 (VWR))] for two hours and probed in a single day with the next major antibodies: anti-β-tubulin (1:100, Developmental Research Hybridoma Financial institution, DSHB #7, AB_2315513), anti-dMiro [75] (1:50,000), anti-Milton [76] (1:1,000, monoclonal antibody 2A108), anti-GFP (1:1,000, Chromotek, PABG1). Membranes had been incubated for 1 hour with both an IRDye secondary antibody (for LI-COR Odyssey imaging) or with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies adopted by a 3-minute incubation with a chemiluminescent substrate (GE Healthcare) for ChemiDoc imaging. Secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies: anti-rabbit (1:5,000, NIF824), anti-mouse (1:5,000, NIF825), anti-guinea pig (1:5,000, SeraCare 5220–0366). LI-COR secondary antibody: IR Dye 800CW goat anti-mouse IgG (1:10,000).

Stay cell imaging of cargo transport and photostimulation

S2R+ cells had been seeded in 4-well Nunc Lab-Tek chambered coverglass (Thermo Scientific) coated with 0.5 mg/ml Concanavalin A (Sigma). To induce the formation of mobile processes, cells had been handled with 1 μM cytochalasin D (Sigma) for 3 to 4 hours earlier than imaging and all through the imaging interval. Earlier than imaging, cells had been stained with the next dyes, relying on the precise experimental setting: 200 nM MitoTracker Inexperienced FM, 200 nM MitoTracker DeepRed FM (Thermo Scientific), 100 nM MitoView 405 (Biotium), 1X TubulinTracker DeepRed (Thermo Scientific), 1X ActinTracker (CellMask Actin Tracker Stain, Invitrogen). The MitoView 405 dye was added to the cells quarter-hour prior imaging and saved all through. All the opposite dyes had been washed off previous to imaging, after half-hour of incubation. Stay cell imaging was carried out utilizing a Nikon A1RHD inverted confocal microscope, geared up with a photostimulation unit, GaAsP and multialkali PMT detectors, 405-nm, 488-nm, 561-nm, and 640-nm laser strains and a Nikon 60X/1.4NA Plan Apochromatic oil immersion goal, until specified in any other case. Experiments had been carried out at a continuing 25°C temperature in an Okolab incubation system, and time sequence had been digitally captured with the Nikon NIS-Parts software program at 1 body per seconds (fps), until specified in any other case.

Sustained Cut up-Miro photocleavage in S2R+ cells was achieved with a 0.3% (0.017 mW) 488-nm laser, scan zoom of 4, at a framerate of 1 fps for your complete period of the experiment. For twin color imaging throughout sustained Cut up-Miro photocleavage, a body each 1 minute was acquired with both the 405-nm, 561-nm, or 640-nm laser line. Transient whole-cell photocleavage of Cut up-Miro with untagged C-terminus was achieved with a stimulation step of 570 ms utilizing a 4% 488-mn laser at a scan pace of 4 fps and a pair of scanning iterations. In these experiments, a Nikon 40X/1.15NA Apochromatic water immersion goal with a scan zoom of 4 was used. The stimulation space was set to 492.7 μm2, enough to cowl the entire cell space. Time sequence earlier than and after stimulation had been acquired at 0.5 fps. To attain transient photocleavage of double-tagged Cut up-Miro, cells had been imaged with each a 488-nm (0.8%, scan time 0.6 seconds/body) and a 561-mn (1%, scan time 0.6 seconds/body) laser for 8 seconds with a body charge of 0.5 fps, scan zoom of 4. Restoration was monitored by imaging with a 561-nm laser with a body charge of 0.5 seconds for as much as 3 minutes.

To mix optogenetic stimulation with 3-colour imaging and quick acquisition (as in Fig 3), the identical settings had been maintained, and the 640-nm laser energy was set to 0.8%.

Imaging the neurons of the grownup Drosophila wing was carried out as reported in Vagnoni and colleagues [37,38]. For speedy blue mild photostimulation on this tissue, a 5% (0.184 mW) 488-nm laser, scan zoom of 4 was used with a scan pace of 4 fps and 4 scanning iterations. The entire period of the stimulation step was 1.14 seconds, and the stimulation space was set to cowl a 46.23 μm2 area of the neuronal axons.

Mitochondrial trafficking in grownup wing neurons was recorded with a body charge of 0.5 frames/seconds for five minutes and quantified from the bundle of marginal axons alongside the L1 vein, basically as we described beforehand [37,38]. The in vivo trafficking experiments had been carried out utilizing a Nikon spinning disk system with a CSU-X1 scanning head (Yokogawa) and an inverted microscope stand (Eclipse Ti-E (Nikon)) geared up with a 60 × CFI Apo oil immersion goal (1.4 NA) and an EM-CCD digital camera (Du 897 iXon Extremely (Andor)). Imaging of mitochondrial motility and concomitant Cut up-Miro photocleavage had been achieved utilizing a 15% 488-nm laser mild and 400-ms mild publicity.

Evaluation of mitochondrial morphology and mitochondria-ER contacts

Mitochondrial morphology within the cell soma was analysed from cells exhibiting a clearly interconnected community earlier than photocleavage, utilizing Fiji/ImageJ and a pipeline tailored from Chaudhry and colleagues [77]. Briefly, the “Adaptive Threshold” command was used to create binary photographs that had been individually checked for accuracy in marking the mitochondrial community. The “Analyse particles” command was used to measure mitochondrial dimension, with a cutoff set at 0.09 μm2. A skeleton of the mitochondrial community inside every cell was obtained and analysed with the “Skeletonize” and “Analyze skeleton (2D/3D)” capabilities, respectively. The identical evaluation pipeline was used to quantifying mitochondria-ER contacts by making a masks of the SPLICS sign and counting the GFP puncta all through the cell.

Mitochondrial mass was outlined as the full space coated by mitochondria throughout the cell and normalised to the primary time level. The mitochondrial side ratio (AR) was measured in single mitochondria smaller than 6 μm2 and was outlined because the ratio between the longest and the shortest axis of the organelle. For the evaluation of the mitochondrial community branching, solely branches emanating from the primary mitochondrial skeleton had been thought-about.

Evaluation of Cut up-Miro kinetics

The kinetics of the cytoplasmic launch of mCherry-tagged Cut up-Miro N-terminus after photocleavage and the reconstitution on the mitochondria was analysed by measuring the cytosolic fluorescence depth of the mCherry earlier than and after photocleavage. For cell tradition experiments with single-tagged Cut up-Miro, photographs had been analysed with the Normal Evaluation software of the Nikon NIS-Parts Software program by defining a area of curiosity (ROI) protecting the mobile cytosol (with no mitochondria) and measuring the fluorescence depth at every time level. For cell tradition experiments with double-tagged Cut up-Miro and for neuronal in vivo experiments, photographs had been analysed with Fiji/ImageJ by measuring the fluorescence depth of a cytosolic ROI devoid of mitochondria (space is 0.451-μm2 and 0.126-μm2, respectively). For every cell or fly wing, the fluorescence depth over time was normalised to a scale from 0 to 1, the place 0 corresponds to the minimal worth measured earlier than Cut up-Miro N-terminus launch and 1 to the utmost worth measured after photocleavage. Mitochondria/cytosolic ratio of each mCherry-tagged Cut up-MiroN and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroC in S2R+ cells had been calculated by measuring the fluorescence depth at totally different time factors from two 0.451-μm2 ROIs situated throughout the mitochondrial community and inside a proximal space of the cytosol devoid of mitochondria. An mCherry ratio of 1 signifies the sign is homogeneous all through the cytoplasm, and, thus, mCherry-Cut up-MiroN has reached full launch.

Stay cell calcium imaging in S2R+ cells

S2R+ cells had been imaged with a Nikon Ti-E inverted epifluorescence microscope geared up with a Nikon 60X/1.4NA Plan Apochromatic oil immersion goal, a mercury lamp (Nikon Intensilight C-HGFI) for illumination, and a Twin Andor Neo sCMOS digital camera for detection. Cells had been plated on a Concanavalin A-coated 18-mm coverslip and imaged in a Ludin imaging chamber (Kind 1, Life Imaging Companies) in S2 media. Cells had been imaged at 1 fps for 3 minutes underneath blue mild, which was enough to induce Cut up-Miro–dependent mitochondrial community retraction, previous to ionomycin stimulation. A peristaltic pump system (Ismatec) was used to perfuse the imaging chamber with 2.5 μM ionomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) till all of the media within the chamber was changed. Further 5-minute imaging at 1 fps was carried out to document the dynamic mito-GCaMP6 sign. To confirm Cut up-Miro cleavage, a body with inexperienced mild (to seize mCherry-Cut up-MiroN) was acquired in the beginning and the top of every acquisition interval.

To quantify mitochondrial calcium, an ROI was drawn to stipulate single cells and the fluorescence depth of mito-GCaMP6f sign measured utilizing the Nikon NIS-Parts software program. Response curves had been aligned on the base of the response peak, and, for every cell, the fluorescence depth at each time level was normalised to the worth of the primary body. Solely cells that responded not less than 2-fold to ionomycin within the first 100 seconds had been included within the quantification. Mito-GCaMP6f “peak” was outlined as the utmost fold-change worth reached throughout imaging. The time to succeed in the height was calculated because the Δt between the “peak” time level and the time of first response to stimulation.

Behavioural assay

Flies had been anesthetised with CO2 on the day of eclosion, transferred to new meals, and aged for both 2 or 8 days previous to the assay. On the day of the assay, flies had been briefly anesthetised on ice and individually loaded into 65-mm glass tubes on custom-made platforms. Fly exercise was recorded in an optogenetic enclosure (BFK Lab) geared up with LEDs for 444-nm blue mild stimulation and a webcam for video recording. The place of every fly was robotically tracked and the quantification of the fly locomotor exercise carried out utilizing the Drosophila ARousal Monitoring (DART) system [45,46]. Flies had been left to acclimatise for 20 minutes earlier than beginning the experiment. Fly exercise was recorded constantly for half-hour earlier than the blue LED mild was switched on for two hours (energy on the platform: 5 mW/cm2). After the blue mild was switched off, fly actions had been recorded for a further hour, for a mixed experimental time of three hours, half-hour. Flies had been outlined as “lively” if displaying bouts of exercise of not less than 2 mm/seconds. The lively common pace refers back to the pace of fly motion when lively. The motion initiation is outlined because the variety of occasions a bout of exercise is began per second. The % exercise represents the share of time the fly spends transferring.

Statistical evaluation and picture preparation

Information had been analysed with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 9. Statistical checks and variety of replicates are reported within the determine legends. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information. Pictures had been assembled utilizing Fiji/ImageJ. For presentation functions, “Subtract Background” (rolling ball radius = 20 pixels), and both the “Despeckle” or “Clean” filters had been used to scale back salt and pepper noise. All photographs in the identical experimental sequence had been processed in the identical method.

Supporting data

S1 Fig. Cut up-Miro reconstitution and kinetics of Cut up-Miro harbouring wild-type and mutant LOV2 proteins.

(A) EGFP-Cut up-Miro-mCherry is reconstituted and localises on the mitochondria within the absence of sustained blue mild irradiation. S2R+ cells had been cotransfected with mCherry-tagged Cut up-MiroC (magenta) and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroN (inexperienced), mitochondria are stained with MitoTracker Deep Pink (MTDR, cyan). Notice the EGFP/mCherry tags are appended at totally different termini in comparison with the mCherry-Cut up-Miro-EGFP proven in Fig 1. (B, E) Localisation of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN earlier than and after a 570-ms pulse of blue mild. S2R+ cells are cotransfected with untagged Cut up-MiroC and mCherry-Cut up-MiroN containing the T406A, T407A mutations within the N-terminus of LOV2 (LAAA, in B) or mCherry-Cut up-MiroN containing the wild-type sequence (LATT, in E). Earlier than irradiation, Cut up-Miro is reconstituted on the mitochondria, indicated by the colocalisation of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN (gray) and the MitoTracker Deep Pink (MTDR) staining. Instantly after irradiation (18 seconds), Cut up-MiroN is launched into the cytoplasm (indicated by a extra homogenous gray color), and it totally reconstitutes inside 2 minutes. (C, D) Quantification of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN half-time launch (C) and restoration (D) after photocleavage, relative to (B). In (D), left panel reveals ranges of cytosolic Cut up-Miro N-terminus quantified after the utmost launch is reached; proper panel: restoration half-time. Strong line in (D) is exponential curve match. In (B) and (E), the cartoon depicts photocleavage and reconstitution of mCherry-tagged Cut up-Miro. s, seconds. Scale bar: 10 μm. (F, G) Comparability of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN launch (F) and restoration (G) half-time after photocleavage reveals no important distinction between the two LOV2 variants (unpaired Pupil t take a look at). The LATT (wild-type) to LAAA mutation within the N-terminus of LOV2 has been reported to have a stabilising impact on the Jα helix in cultured cells at 37°C [17,18]. We didn’t discover any noticeable distinction within the steady-state reconstitution effectivity of the two variants in S2R+ cells cultured at 25°C. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. Circles, variety of cells, from 2 impartial experiments. Scale bar: 10 μm (A) and 5 μm (B, E). The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s003

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Perception into the regulation of mitochondrial motility within the processes of S2R+ cells by endogenous Miro and Cut up-Miro.

(A) Consultant western blots of Miro from whole lysates of management and Miro RNAi-treated S2R+ cells. (B) Obligation cycle evaluation describes the common time mitochondria spend transferring anterogradely, retrogradely, or pausing. For every parameter, all mitochondrial values from every cell had been averaged and in contrast between management and Miro dsRNA situation utilizing a a number of Pupil t checks. Variety of mitochondria analysed are in brackets from 29 (Ctrl dsRNA) and 36 (Miro dsRNA) cells, respectively, from 2 impartial experiments. (C) Run velocities of quick and lengthy runs in management dsRNA-treated S2R+ cells exhibiting that Miro-dependent lengthy runs are considerably extra processive than the quick, Miro-independent runs (Fig 2C). Variety of runs analysed are in brackets, from 2 impartial experiments. Mann–Whitney take a look at. (D) Cut up-Miro interacts with Milton in S2R+ cells. Cells had been transfected with Cut up-Miro or Management (as proven in E) and the full cell lysates immunoprecipitated utilizing GFP-beads to tug down EGFP-tagged Cut up-Miro C-terminus. Immunoprecipitates had been blotted and probed with anti-GFP antibody (to detect Cut up-Miro C-terminus), anti-Miro antibody (to detect Cut up-Miro N-terminus), and an anti-Milton antibody. Inputs are whole lysates (25 μg protein). (E) Cartoon exhibiting Cut up-Miro and Management constructs with the GFP and Miro antibodies used for immunoprecipitation and western blotting in (D). (F) Consultant kymographs of mitochondrial transport within the processes of S2R+ cells transfected with mCherry-tagged Zdk1-MiroC (Management), mCherry-Miro (wt-Miro), and mCherry-Cut up-Miro (Cut up-Miro). Scale bars: 2 μm (distance) and 5 seconds (time). G) Distribution of mitochondria run lengths within the processes of S2R+ cells, transfected with management, wt-Miro, and Cut up-Miro, as proven in F. N = variety of mitochondrial runs. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at. (H) Obligation cycle evaluation describing the common time mitochondria spend transferring anterogradely, retrogradely, or pausing in management, wt-Miro, and Cut up-Miro–transfected cells, relative to (F). For every parameter, all mitochondrial values per cell had been averaged and in contrast by one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at. Variety of mitochondria are in brackets from 16 (management), 15 (wt-Miro), and 15 (Cut up-Miro) cells, respectively, from 3 impartial experiments. (I) S2R+ cells transfected with wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro had been imaged for 1 minute with a 561-nm laser, to seize the mCherry sign, adopted by 1-minute imaging with 488-nm blue mild, to seize the EGFP sign after Cut up-Miro photocleavage (relative to Fig 2E). Variety of mitochondria are in brackets from 11 (wt-Miro) and 17 (Cut up-Miro) cells, from 3 impartial experiments. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. Kolmogorov–Smirnov take a look at confirmed no statistical distinction between teams. (J) Distribution of mitochondrial run lengths within the anterograde path within the processes of S2R+ cells, throughout the first and seventh minute of time-lapse imaging with blue mild in cells transfected with wt-Miro or Cut up-Miro. N = variety of runs. Mann–Whitney take a look at confirmed no statistical distinction between teams. (Ok) Run velocities for lengthy processive anterograde and retrograde runs in S2R+ cells transfected with Cut up-Miro and Miro dsRNA (which targets endogenous Miro) and imaged by time-lapse for 7 minutes underneath blue mild. Circles, variety of runs, from 2 impartial experiments. Mann–Whitney take a look at reveals no distinction between first and seventh minutes of imaging, with the velocities remaining excessive in comparison with nontransfected situation (e.g., Figs 2H and S2C). This outcome reveals that the velocities of the processive mitochondria, augmented as a consequence of Cut up-Miro overexpression, stay elevated even after discount of endogenous Miro, suggesting Miro is just not needed for sustaining mitochondrial velocities. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s004

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Prolonged characterisation of the results of Cut up-Miro photocleavage and SNPH overexpression in S2R+ cells.

(A) Quantification of the full space coated by the mitochondria throughout the cell. Every measurement was normalised to the common group worth (wt-Miro, Cut up-Miro) at time level 0. Comparability throughout time factors was carried out by repeated measures one-way ANOVA adopted by Tukey’s put up hoc take a look at. Information are reported as imply ± SEM. Circle, variety of cells, from 3 impartial experiments. (B) S2 cells are transfected with EGFP-tagged Cut up-Miro N-terminus (inexperienced) and stained with MitoTracker DeepRed (MTDR, cyan). Center panel: white and magenta stars point out untransfected and transfected cells, respectively. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) Obligation cycle evaluation describes the common time peroxisomes spend on lengthy runs, quick runs, or pausing. For every parameter, all peroxisomal values from every cell had been averaged and in contrast between time factors. Statistical significance was evaluated by a number of Mann–Whitney checks. (D) Bar chart reveals the common peroxisomal content material at minute 1 and seven of time-lapse imaging with blue mild. Circles characterize the variety of peroxisomes inside every course of. Statistical significance was evaluated by Wilcoxon take a look at. In (C, D), variety of processes and cells: wt-Miro = 24, 11, Cut up-Miro = 39, 16, from 3 impartial experiments. There is no such thing as a important distinction within the motility and variety of peroxisomes in every course of between timepoints. (E) Consultant photographs exhibiting S2R+ cells transfected with Cut up-Miro and imaged by time-lapse with blue mild for 7 minutes. Publicity to blue mild (to induce Cut up-Miro photocleavage) results in altered mitochondrial morphology and distribution, with out noticeable disorganisation of the microtubule community as detected by the Tubulin Tracker (magenta). Scale bar: 10 μm. Not proven, mCherry-tagged Cut up-Miro N-terminus. (F) Bar chart reveals the common mitochondrial content material at minute 1, 3, and seven of time-lapse imaging with blue mild within the processes of S2R+ transfected with both wt-Miro or Cut up-Miro. Circles characterize the variety of mitochondria inside every course of at minute 1 and seven. Information had been analysed by Friedman take a look at with Dunn’s a number of comparability take a look at. Variety of processes: wt-Miro = 39, Cut up-Miro = 50 from 11 and 17 cells, respectively, from 3 impartial experiments. (G) Size of mobile processes imaged for 7 minutes underneath time-lapse publicity to 488-nm blue mild to attain Cut up-Miro photocleavage. Circles, variety of the processes. Variety of cells: wt-Miro = 11, Cut up-Miro = 17, from 3 impartial experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated by Mann–Whitney take a look at. (H) Consultant kymographs from processes of cells transfected with an empty vector (Management) or EGFP-SNPH (SNPH). Mitochondria had been stained with MitoTracker Deep Pink (MitoTracker). Scale bars: 2 μm (distance) and 10 seconds (time). (I) Proportion of motile mitochondria in mobile processes of management or SNPH-expressing cells. Variety of processes: management = 9, SNPH = 9, from 8 cells, from 2 impartial experiments. Information are proven as imply ± SEM and had been analysed by unpaired Pupil t take a look at. *p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s005

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Prolonged characterisation of Cut up-Miro in vivo.

(A) Western blots of lysates from male fly heads of the reported genotypes confirms the expression of UAS-wt-Miro and UAS-Cut up-Miro, in both Miro heterozygous (miroSd32/+) and null backgrounds (miroSd32/B682), utilizing the Appl-Gal4 driver. UAS-wt-Miro is expressed from attP2; the UAS-MiroN and UAS-MiroC (to reconstitute Cut up-Miro) had been expressed from attP40 and attP2, respectively. The upper molecular weight of wt-Miro and Cut up-Miro in comparison with endogenous Miro is per the presence of the mCherry tag (wt-Miro) and mCherry/LOV2 tags (Cut up-Miro). Please notice that the decrease expression of Cut up-Miro in comparison with wt-Miro doesn’t considerably have an effect on the proportion of rescued flies, as proven in Fig 7A. The highest membrane was blotted with an anti-Miro antibody recognising an N-terminal epitope (see additionally S2E Fig). (B) Consultant photographs of axons within the L3 vein of the grownup dwell fly wing. For colocalisation experiments, flies specific mCherry-tagged wt-Miro (attP40) and EGFP-tagged Miro C-terminus (attP2). Cut up-Miro flies specific the N-terminus and C-terminus halves of Cut up-Miro from attP40 and attP2, respectively. All constructs had been expressed underneath the management of the Appl-Gal4 driver in a miro+/+ background. Arrows spotlight examples of colocalised sign. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) Quantification of the kinetics of Cut up-Miro restoration after photocleavage within the neurons of the grownup fly wing in vivo. UAS-mCherry-Cut up-MiroN and UAS-MiroC had been each expressed from attP40, utilizing the Appl-Gal4 driver. The primary time level corresponds to most ranges of mCherry-Cut up-MiroN launch. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. Pink strong line, exponential curve match (n = 6 wings, from 3 flies). (D) There is no such thing as a distinction within the half-life restoration of Cut up-Miro after photobleaching in S2R+ cells (in vitro) and within the neurons of the grownup fly wing (in vivo). Information are proven as imply ± SEM and had been analysed by Mann–Whitney take a look at. Circles, variety of cells (in vitro) and wings (in vivo) analysed. (E, F) Variety of motile mitochondria captured in a 50-μm axonal tract in 7-day-old wing neurons expressing wt-Miro (E) or Cut up-Miro (F). Bar charts present the common mitochondrial content material at every time level. Crammed circles characterize the variety of mitochondria inside every axonal bundle at minute 1 and 5. Information had been analysed by paired Pupil t take a look at. Variety of wings analysed: wt-Miro = 5, Cut up-Miro = 6, from 2 impartial experiments. (G, H) Anterograde velocity (G) and run size (H) of axonal mitochondria in wing neurons expressing wt-Miro or Cut up-Miro, throughout the first and fifth minute of blue mild publicity, relative to (E, F). Circles characterize tracked mitochondria. Information had been analysed by Pupil t take a look at. Because of the total decrease variety of bidirectional and retrograde-moving mitochondria, a significant statistical evaluation of their velocity and run size is just not potential. The information underlying the graphs proven within the figures will be present in S1 Information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s007

(TIF)

S2 Film. Consultant time-lapse film of S2R+ cells transfected with mCherry-Cut up-MiroN and untagged Cut up-MiroC, earlier than and after a 570-ms pulse of blue mild.

Upon irradiation with 488-nm blue mild, mCherry-Cut up-MiroN (gray) is launched from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm and totally reconstitutes inside 120 seconds.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s013

(MOV)

S3 Film. Consultant time-lapse film of S2R+ cells transfected with mCherry-Cut up-MiroN and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroC and imaged with the 488-nm laser to seize EGFP-targeted mitochondria (gray) whereas photocleaving Cut up-Miro.

Notice the sturdy mitochondrial morphological modifications throughout the interval of blue mild imaging. Not proven, mCherry-Cut up-MiroN.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s014

(AVI)

S4 Film. Consultant time-lapse film of S2R+ cells transfected with mCherry-Cut up-MiroN and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroC and imaged with the 561-nm laser for 1 minute (to seize Cut up-Miro through mCherry, pink) earlier than switching to the 488-nm laser for 7 minutes to seize EGFP-targeted mitochondria (inexperienced) whereas photocleaving Cut up-Miro.

Notice the sturdy mitochondrial morphological modifications and lowered motility throughout the interval of blue mild imaging.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s015

(AVI)

S5 Film. Consultant time-lapse film of S2R+ cells transfected with mCherry-wt-Miro and EGFP-tagged Cut up-MiroC and imaged with the 561-nm laser for 1 minute (to seize wt-Miro through mCherry, pink) earlier than switching to the 488-nm laser for 7 minutes to seize EGFP-targeted mitochondria (inexperienced).

Notice that, contrarily to Cut up-Miro transfected cells (S4 Film), there are not any mitochondrial morphological modifications or lowered motility throughout the interval of blue mild imaging.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s016

(AVI)

S6 Film. Consultant time-lapse film of mitochondria motility in a 30-μm axonal tract of grownup wing neurons expressing both wt-Miro (high film) or Cut up-Miro (backside film) in a miro+/− background.

Mitochondrial motility is proven after 1 and 5 minutes of blue mild publicity. Every film corresponds to 30 seconds of real-time imaging.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002273.s017

(AVI)

References

  1. 1.
    Eberhardt EL, Ludlam AV, Tan Z, Cianfrocco MA. Miro: A molecular change on the heart of mitochondrial regulation. Protein Sci. 2020;29(6):1269–1284. pmid:32056317
  2. 2.
    Reis Ok, Fransson Å, Aspenström P. The Miro GTPases: On the coronary heart of the mitochondrial transport equipment. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(9):1391–1398. pmid:19376118
  3. 3.
    Lee KS, Lu B. The myriad roles of Miro within the nervous system: axonal transport of mitochondria and past. Entrance Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:330. pmid:25389385
  4. 4.
    Guo X, Macleod GT, Wellington A, Hu F, Panchumarthi S, Schoenfield M, et al. The GTPase dMiro is required for axonal transport of mitochondria to Drosophila synapses. Neuron. 2005;47(3):379–393. pmid:16055062
  5. 5.
    Nguyen TT, Oh SS, Weaver D, Lewandowska A, Maxfield D, Schuler MH, et al. Lack of Miro1-directed mitochondrial motion leads to a novel murine mannequin for neuron illness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(35):E3631–E3640. pmid:25136135
  6. 6.
    López-Doménech G, Covill-Cooke C, Ivankovic D, Halff EF, Sheehan DF, Norkett R, et al. Miro proteins coordinate microtubule- and actin-dependent mitochondrial transport and distribution. EMBO J. 2018;37(3):321–336. pmid:29311115
  7. 7.
    Russo GJ, Louie Ok, Wellington A, Macleod GT, Hu F, Panchumarthi S, et al. Drosophila Miro is required for each anterograde and retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport. J Neurosci. 2009;29(17):5443–5455. pmid:19403812
  8. 8.
    MacAskill AF, Rinholm JE, Twelvetrees AE, Arancibia-Carcamo IL, Muir J, Fransson A, et al. Miro1 Is a Calcium Sensor for Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Localization of Mitochondria at Synapses. Neuron. 2009;61(4):541–555. pmid:19249275
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Schwarz TL. The Mechanism of Ca2+-Dependent Regulation of Kinesin-Mediated Mitochondrial Motility. Cell. 2009;136(1):163–174.
  10. 10.
    Vaccaro V, Devine MJ, Higgs NF, Kittler JT. Miro1-dependent mitochondrial positioning drives the rescaling of presynaptic Ca2+ indicators throughout homeostatic plasticity. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(2):231–240.
  11. 11.
    Li L, Conradson DM, Bharat V, Kim MJ, Hsieh CH, Minhas PS, et al. A mitochondrial membrane-bridging equipment mediates sign transduction of intramitochondrial oxidation. Nat Metab. 2021;3(9):1242–1258. pmid:34504353
  12. 12.
    Lee S, Lee KS, Huh S, Liu S, Lee DY, Hong SH, et al. Polo Kinase Phosphorylates Miro to Management ER-Mitochondria Contact Websites and Mitochondrial Ca2+ Homeostasis in Neural Stem Cell Improvement. Dev Cell. 2016;37(2):174–189.
  13. 13.
    Frederick RL, McCaffery JM, Cunningham KW, Okamoto Ok, Shaw JM. Yeast Miro GTPase, Gem1p, regulates mitochondrial morphology through a novel pathway. J Cell Biol. 2004;167(1):87–98. pmid:15479738
  14. 14.
    Wang H, Vilela M, Winkler A, Tarnawski M, Schlichting I, Yumerefendi H, et al. LOVTRAP: an optogenetic system for photoinduced protein dissociation. Nat Strategies. 2016;13(9):755–758. pmid:27427858
  15. 15.
    Van Haren J, Charafeddine RA, Ettinger A, Wang H, Hahn KM, Wittmann T. Native management of intracellular microtubule dynamics by EB1 photodissociation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):252–261. pmid:29379139
  16. 16.
    Dema A, van Haren J, Wittmann T. Optogenetic EB1 inactivation shortens metaphase spindles by disrupting cortical force-producing interactions with astral microtubules. Curr Biol. 2022;32(5):1197–1205.e4. pmid:35090591
  17. 17.
    van Haren J, Adachi LS, Wittmann T. Optogenetic Management of Microtubule Dynamics. Strategies Mol Biol. 2020;2101:211–234. pmid:31879907
  18. 18.
    Strickland D, Lin Y, Wagner E, Hope CM, Zayner J, Antoniou C, et al. TULIPs: Tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology. Nat Strategies. 2012;9(4):379–384. pmid:22388287
  19. 19.
    Ally S, Larson AG, Barlan Ok, Rice SE, Gelfand VI. Reverse-polarity motors activate each other to set off cargo transport in dwell cells. J Cell Biol. 2009 Dec 28;187(7):1071–1082. pmid:20038680
  20. 20.
    Vagnoni A, Hoffmann PC, Bullock SL. Lowering Lissencephaly-1 ranges augments mitochondrial transport and has a protecting impact in grownup Drosophila neurons. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(1):178–190. pmid:26598558
  21. 21.
    Jolly AL, Luan CH, Dusel BE, Dunne SF, Winding M, Dixit VJ, et al. A Genome-wide RNAi Display for Microtubule Bundle Formation and Lysosome Motility Regulation in Drosophila S2 Cells. Cell Rep. 2016;14(3):611–620. pmid:26774481
  22. 22.
    van Spronsen M, Mikhaylova M, Lipka J, Schlager MA, van den Heuvel DJ, Kuijpers M, et al. TRAK/Milton motor-adaptor proteins steer mitochondrial trafficking to axons and dendrites. Neuron. 2013;77(3):485–502. pmid:23395375
  23. 23.
    Brickley Ok, Stephenson FA. Trafficking kinesin protein (TRAK)-mediated transport of mitochondria in axons of hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(20):18079–18092. pmid:21454691
  24. 24.
    Glater EE, Megeath LJ, Stowers RS, Schwarz TL. Axonal transport of mitochondria requires milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is mild chain impartial. J Cell Biol. 2006;173(4):545–557. pmid:16717129
  25. 25.
    Fransson Å, Ruusala A, Aspenström P. The atypical Rho GTPases Miro-1 and Miro-2 have important roles in mitochondrial trafficking. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;344(2):500–510. pmid:16630562
  26. 26.
    Liu S, Sawada T, Lee S, Yu W, Silverio G, Alapatt P, et al. Parkinson’s disease-associated kinase PINK1 regulates Miro protein stage and axonal transport of mitochondria. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002537. pmid:22396657
  27. 27.
    Nemani N, Carvalho E, Tomar D, Dong Z, Ketschek A, Breves SL, et al. MIRO-1 Determines Mitochondrial Form Transition upon GPCR Activation and Ca2+ Stress. Cell Rep. 2018;23(4):1005–1019.
  28. 28.
    Chung JYM, Steen JA, Schwarz TL. Phosphorylation-Induced Motor Shedding Is Required at Mitosis for Correct Distribution and Passive Inheritance of Mitochondria. Cell Rep. 2016;16(8):2142–2155. pmid:27524620
  29. 29.
    Kang J-S, Tian J-H, Pan P-Y, Zald P, Li C, Deng C, et al. Docking of axonal mitochondria by syntaphilin controls their mobility and impacts short-term facilitation. Cell. 2008;132(1):137–148. pmid:18191227
  30. 30.
    Lee Ok-S, Huh S, Lee S, Wu Z, Kim A-Ok, Kang H-Y, et al. Altered ER-mitochondria contact impacts mitochondria calcium homeostasis and contributes to neurodegeneration in vivo in illness fashions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(38):E8844–E8853. pmid:30185553
  31. 31.
    Niescier RF, Hong Ok, Park D, Min KT. MCU Interacts with Miro1 to Modulate Mitochondrial Features in Neurons. J Neurosci. 2018;38(20):4666–4677. pmid:29686046
  32. 32.
    Modi S, López-Doménech G, Halff EF, Covill-Cooke C, Ivankovic D, Melandri D, et al. Miro clusters regulate ER-mitochondria contact websites and hyperlink cristae group to the mitochondrial transport equipment. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4399. pmid:31562315
  33. 33.
    Guillén-Samander A, Leonzino M, Hanna MG, Tang N, Shen H, De Camilli P. VPS13D bridges the ER to mitochondria and peroxisomes through Miro. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(5):e202010004. pmid:33891013
  34. 34.
    Hewitt VL, Miller-Fleming L, Andreazza S, Mattedi F, Prudent J, Polleux F, et al. Lowering pdzd8-mediated mitochondrial-ER contacts in neurons improves health by rising mitophagy. Life Sci Alliance. 2022;5(11):e202201531.
  35. 35.
    Cieri D, Vicario M, Giacomello M, Vallese F, Filadi R, Wagner T, et al. SPLICS: a break up inexperienced fluorescent protein-based contact web site sensor for slim and broad heterotypic organelle juxtaposition. Cell Loss of life Differ. 2018;25(6):1131–1145. pmid:29229997
  36. 36.
    Granat L, Knorr DY, Ranson DC, Hamer EL, Chakrabarty RP, Mattedi F, et al. Yeast NDI1 reconfigures neuronal metabolism and prevents the unfolded protein response in mitochondrial advanced I deficiency. PLoS Genet. 2023 Jul;19(7):e1010793. pmid:37399212
  37. 37.
    Vagnoni A, Bullock SL. A easy methodology for imaging axonal transport in getting old neurons utilizing the grownup Drosophila wing. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1711–1723. pmid:27560175
  38. 38.
    Vagnoni A, Bullock SL. A cAMP/PKA/Kinesin-1 Axis Promotes the Axonal Transport of Mitochondria in Ageing Drosophila Neurons. Curr Biol. 2018;28:1265–1272. pmid:29606421
  39. 39.
    Kwon SK, Sando R, Lewis TL, Hirabayashi Y, Maximov A, Polleux F. LKB1 Regulates Mitochondria-Dependent Presynaptic Calcium Clearance and Neurotransmitter Launch Properties at Excitatory Synapses alongside Cortical Axons. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(7):e1002516. pmid:27429220
  40. 40.
    Solar T, Qiao H, Pan PY, Chen Y, Sheng ZH. Motile axonal mitochondria contribute to the variability of presynaptic energy. Cell Rep. 2013 Aug 15;4(3):413–419. pmid:23891000
  41. 41.
    Aery Jones EA, Giocomo LM. Neural ensembles in navigation: From single cells to inhabitants codes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2023;78:102665. pmid:36542882
  42. 42.
    Langdon C, Genkin M, Engel TA. A unifying perspective on neural manifolds and circuits for cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023;13:1–15. pmid:37055616
  43. 43.
    Panchal Ok, Tiwari AK. Miro, a Rho GTPase genetically interacts with Alzheimer’s disease-associated genes (Tau, Aβ 42 and Appl) in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol Open. 2020;9(9):bio049569.
  44. 44.
    Shaltouki A, Hsieh CH, Kim MJ, Wang X. Alpha-synuclein delays mitophagy and focusing on Miro rescues neuron loss in Parkinson’s fashions. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(4):607–620. pmid:29923074
  45. 45.
    Faville R, Kottler B, Goodhill GJ, Shaw PJ, van Swinderen B. How deeply does your mutant sleep? Probing arousal to higher perceive sleep defects in Drosophila. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8454. pmid:25677943
  46. 46.
    Kottler B, Faville R, Bridi JC, Hirth F. Inverse Management of Turning Conduct by Dopamine D1 Receptor Signaling in Columnar and Ring Neurons of the Central Advanced in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2019;29(4):567–577.e6. pmid:30713106
  47. 47.
    Fenton AR, Jongens TA, Holzbaur ELF. Mitochondrial adaptor TRAK2 prompts and functionally hyperlinks opposing kinesin and dynein motors. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4578. pmid:34321481
  48. 48.
    Henrichs V, Grycova L, Barinka C, Nahacka Z, Neuzil J, Diez S, et al. Mitochondria-adaptor TRAK1 promotes kinesin-1 pushed transport in crowded environments. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3123. pmid:32561740
  49. 49.
    Canty JT, Hensley A, Aslan M, Jack A, Yildiz A. TRAK adaptors regulate the recruitment and activation of dynein and kinesin in mitochondrial transport. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1376. pmid:36914620
  50. 50.
    Zhao Y, Tune E, Wang W, Hsieh CH, Wang X, Feng W, et al. Metaxins are core elements of mitochondrial transport adaptor complexes. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):83. pmid:33397950
  51. 51.
    Mahecic D, Carlini L, Kleele T, Colom A, Goujon A, Matile S, et al. Mitochondrial membrane stress governs fission. Cell Rep. 2021;35(2):108947. pmid:33852852
  52. 52.
    Helle SCJ, Feng Q, Aebersold MJ, Hirt L, Grüter RR, Vahid A, et al. Mechanical power induces mitochondrial fission. Elife. 2017;6:e30292. pmid:29119945
  53. 53.
    Tune Y, Huang P, Liu X, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Cui B, et al. Gentle-inducible deformation of mitochondria in dwell cells. Cell Chem Biol. 2022;29(1):109–119.e3. pmid:34157274
  54. 54.
    König T, Nolte H, Aaltonen MJ, Tatsuta T, Krols M, Stroh T, et al. MIROs and DRP1 drive mitochondrial-derived vesicle biogenesis and promote high quality management. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(12):1271–1286. pmid:34873283
  55. 55.
    Qin J, Guo Y, Xue B, Shi P, Chen Y, Su QP, et al. ER-mitochondria contacts promote mtDNA nucleoids lively transportation through mitochondrial dynamic tubulation. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4471. pmid:32901010
  56. 56.
    Floyd C, Levine H, Jarzynski C, Papoian GA. Understanding cytoskeletal avalanches utilizing mechanical stability evaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(41):e2110239118. pmid:34611021
  57. 57.
    Oeding SJ, Majstrowicz Ok, Hu XP, Schwarz V, Freitag A, Honnert U, et al. Identification of Miro1 and Miro2 as mitochondrial receptors for myosin XIX. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(17):jcs219469. pmid:30111583
  58. 58.
    Bocanegra JL, Fujita BM, Melton NR, Cowan JM, Schinski EL, Tamir TY, et al. The MyMOMA area of MYO19 encodes for distinct Miro-dependent and Miro-independent mechanisms of interplay with mitochondrial membranes. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2020;77(3–4):149–166. pmid:31479585
  59. 59.
    Sato O, Sakai T, Choo YY, Ikebe R, Watanabe TM, Ikebe M. Mitochondria-associated myosin 19 processively transports mitochondria on actin tracks in residing cells. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(5):101883. pmid:35367209
  60. 60.
    Chang KT, Niescier RF, Min Ok-T. Mitochondrial matrix Ca2+ as an intrinsic sign regulating mitochondrial motility in axons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(37):15456–15461.
  61. 61.
    van Bergeijk P, Adrian M, Hoogenraad CC, Kapitein LC. Optogenetic management of organelle transport and positioning. Nature. 2015;518(7537):111–114. pmid:25561173
  62. 62.
    Ballister ER, Ayloo S, Chenoweth DM, Lampson MA, Holzbaur ELF. Optogenetic management of organelle transport utilizing a photocaged chemical inducer of dimerization. Curr Biol. 2015;25(10):R407–R408. pmid:25989077
  63. 63.
    Gutnick A, Banghart MR, West ER, Schwarz TL. The sunshine-sensitive dimerizer zapalog reveals distinct modes of immobilization for axonal mitochondria. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:768–777. pmid:31061466
  64. 64.
    Harterink M, Van Bergeijk P, Allier C, De Haan B, Van Den Heuvel S, Hoogenraad CC, et al. Gentle-controlled intracellular transport in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2016;26(4):R153–R154. pmid:26906482
  65. 65.
    Yesbolatova A, Saito Y, Kitamoto N, Makino-Itou H, Ajima R, Nakano R, et al. The auxin-inducible degron 2 expertise gives sharp degradation management in yeast, mammalian cells, and mice. Nat Commun.2020;11(1):1–13.
  66. 66.
    Clift D, McEwan WA, Labzin LI, Konieczny V, Mogessie B, James LC, et al. A Technique for the Acute and Speedy Degradation of Endogenous Proteins. Cell. 2017;171(7):1692–1706.e18. pmid:29153837
  67. 67.
    Deubner J, Coulon P, Diester I. Optogenetic approaches to review the mammalian mind. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Aug 1;57:157–163. pmid:31082625
  68. 68.
    Murakoshi H, Shin ME, Parra-Bueno P, Szatmari EM, Shibata ACE, Yasuda R. Kinetics of endogenous CaMKII required for synaptic plasticity revealed by optogenetic kinase inhibitor. Neuron. 2017;94(1):37–47.e5. pmid:28318784
  69. 69.
    Zullo JM, Drake D, Aron L, O’Hern P, Dhamne SC, Davidsohn N, et al. Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST. Nature. 2019;574(7778):359–364. pmid:31619788
  70. 70.
    Simkin D, Hattori S, Ybarra N, Musia TF, Buss EW, Richter H, et al. Ageing-Associated Hyperexcitability in CA3 Pyramidal Neurons Is Mediated by Enhanced A-Kind Ok+ Channel Operate and Expression. J Neurosci. 2015;35(38):13206–13218. pmid:26400949
  71. 71.
    Haberman RP, Koh MT, Gallagher M. Heightened cortical excitability in aged rodents with reminiscence impairment. Neurobiol Ageing. 2017;54:144–151. pmid:28104309
  72. 72.
    Wong CO, Karagas NE, Jung J, Wang Q, Rousseau MA, Chao Y, et al. Regulation of longevity by depolarization-induced activation of PLC-β-IP3R signaling in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(16):e2004253118.
  73. 73.
    Raad H, Ferveur J-F, Ledger N, Capovilla M, Robichon A. Purposeful gustatory position of chemoreceptors in Drosophila wings. Cell Rep. 2016;15(7):1442–1454. pmid:27160896
  74. 74.
    Zhang N, Simpson JH. A pair of commissural command neurons induces Drosophila wing grooming. iScience. 2022;25(2):103792. pmid:35243214
  75. 75.
    Babic M, Russo GJ, Wellington AJ, Sangston RM, Gonzalez M, Zinsmaier KE. Miro’s N-terminal GTPase area is required for transport of mitochondria into axons and dendrites. J Neurosci. 2015;35(14):5754–5771. pmid:25855186
  76. 76.
    Stowers RS, Megeath LJ, Górska-Andrzejak J, Meinertzhagen IA, Schwarz TL. Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends upon milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron. 2002;36(6):1063–1077. pmid:12495622
  77. 77.
    Chaudhry A, Shi R, Luciani DS. A pipeline for multidimensional confocal evaluation of mitochondrial morphology, perform, and dynamics in pancreatic β-cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;318 (2):E87–E101.

[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here