Home Chemistry What’s the largest angle potential at 4-coordinate carbon – 180°? « Henry Rzepa’s Weblog

What’s the largest angle potential at 4-coordinate carbon – 180°? « Henry Rzepa’s Weblog

What’s the largest angle potential at 4-coordinate carbon – 180°? « Henry Rzepa’s Weblog


4-coordinate carbon usually adopts a tetrahedral form, the place the 4 angles on the carbon are all 109.47°. However how massive can that angle get, and might it even get to be 180°?

A search of the CSD (crystal construction database) reveals a spiropentane as having the most important such angle, VAJHAP with 164°[1]

As a result of crystal constructions may need artefacts akin to dysfunction and so on, it’s all the time good to examine this with a calculation; therefore ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP (FAIR information DOI: 10.14469/hpc/11148) for which a calculated angle of 163.8° is reassuring. The smallest angle on this system by the way in which is 58°, fairly regular for three-membered rings.

The localised orbitals present the C-C area defining the big angle to be very “bent” (a banana bond) however in any other case pretty regular.

So can one “engineer” an excellent bigger angle? Changing the C=C of the benzo group with a shorter CHgroup produces the next, which is now virtually linear (virtually a “hemispherical” carbon).

What in regards to the smallest angle at 4-coordinate carbon? May it’s considerably smaller than the 57° famous above for a 3 membered ring? Looking the CSD reveals XAQHIH[2] with an angle of 43° however the calculation above now doesn’t verify this, the angle altering from 43° to 59° throughout optimisation. A reminder that when exploring excessive geometric values, all the time examine with a calculation!


The subsequent candidate is CAZFUE[3] with an obvious measured angle of 48°. This seems to have C2 symmetry, and a calculation with this offers a price of 46.6°. However all just isn’t what it appears. It is a basic instance of a semibullvalene [3,3] Cope rearrangement, caught within the “center” so to talk (See this put up right here). In actual fact this geometry is definitely a transition state, and the crystal construction is the thermal common of two positions, making it seem symmetrical. The bottom state for this construction as calculated is totally different! The 2 angles now emerge as 40 and 57° (common 48.6°). On the “transition state”, one of many 4 “bonds” to carbon is unusually lengthy (2.07Å), which is the direct reason behind the small 48° angle. If this isn’t allowed as a “bond”, the angle on the different true 4-coordinate carbon emerges as regular at 57°

So the reply to the smallest angle does appear to be round 57°, nevertheless it might be as small as 47° if one permits bonds of two.07Å in a single’s definition of 4-coordinate. The candidate for the most important bond angle, of just about 180°, appears an affordable artificial goal!



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here