Like hundreds of thousands of individuals all over the world, I returned joyfully to the movie show to see Barbie, albeit a number of weeks after opening weekend. I basked within the unapologetically feminist themes and felt all of the feelings the media had marketed I’d really feel. Till we have been launched to Physicist Barbie.

A little bit of background: I’m a Ph.D. physicist and the Ann S. Bowers Affiliate Professor of Physics at Cornell College. I’m considered one of 9 ladies college in my division of 45 professors—a strong 20 p.c illustration, in keeping with nationwide averages. I’m additionally a physics training researcher, finding out how college students develop as physicists via our faculty physics programs. A big focus of my analysis has been on ladies’s experiences in physics.

As in my division, ladies are grossly underrepresented in physics, and it’s not unusual for us to be “the one” in a category or a gathering. The problems round this underrepresentation are huge and complicated. A significant theme is that girls, together with those that typically excel in math and science in class, don’t establish as physicists or with physicists. Our lessons and the media painting physics via images of Einstein, Hawking, Schrödinger, Newton, Galileo. Girls don’t see themselves within the physicists broadly represented, and others don’t suppose female ladies appear to be physicists. These pictures matter for ladies to attach their strengths and pursuits in physics with figuring out as a physicist, which in the end impacts whether or not they are going to pursue physics in class or as a profession.

All of us have tales of scholars expressing shock after we introduce ourselves as physics professors. I’ll always remember the story of an undergraduate girl arriving for the primary day of sophistication in her sorority-labeled sweatshirt and asking one other pupil if the seat subsequent to him was free. His response was “This can be a quantum mechanics class,” to which she responded, “I do know. Is that this seat free?” His response once more was “This can be a quantum mechanics class.”

Physics training researchers and gender research students Anna Danielsson and Alison Gonsalves have described ladies’s grappling with “doing gender” and “doing physics,” with a way that these two identities compete. Typically, ladies reject what’s stereotypically female as they embrace their identities as physicists. Whether or not implicitly or explicitly, they search to slot in to the prevailing physics tradition, which is overwhelmingly masculine. They put on pants.

With this grounding, I used to be halted in my reverie of Barbie after we are launched to Physicist Barbie. As she is woke up from her Ken-induced brainwashing, wearing a stereotypical maid’s outfit, she asks, in horror, “What am I sporting?”—to which America Ferrera’s character sympathetically asks Physicist Barbie if she would love some pants.

How is it that, even within the matriarchal and feminist utopia that’s Barbieland, the stereotype of antifeminine physicist identification can’t be rejected? In Barbieland, we see ladies in all roles and positions of energy embracing their femininity. However not the physicist, who needs to put on pants. If “femininity” and “physicist” can’t coexist even in Barbieland, how are we ever to assist its coexistence in the actual world?

For the file, I attended Barbie with one other girl Ph.D. physicist and professor, Kim Modic. We each wore pink attire.